Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gano signs 4 yr $17 Million w/ $9 Million Guaranteed


SOJA

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Car123 said:

Show me any post, at any time, where you have admitted Hurney made any mistakes. Until then, accept your daily beating and crawl away as usual.

  Wow... OK my bad. You found the unicorn. And only after me asking you on numerous occasions. How about a response to the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Kasay kicked for us until the age of 40. Gano is 30 and just hitting his stride. I can't understand who has a clue, not being excited.

And we had to sign an extra kicker for kick offs. Wasted roster position and salary cap. Also, Kasay's distance was diminished considerably at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Wow... OK my bad. You found the unicorn. And only after me asking you on numerous occasions. How about a response to the rest. 

I have criticized Hurney many times. I just believe he’s a far better GM than Gettleman. 

I never saw the posts, but I will take your word for it. I no longer believe you are a Gettleman nuthugger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

So it only took a 9 million dollar contract to trigger half the forum. I can't wait for a real signing.

Yeah the huddle has went to crap. Use to be fun to come on here and read articles. But everyone has the stupid threads about the same crap. Someone needs to take over and fix this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrianS said:

In fact, he did not.

John Kasay, career stats:  40-49 yards 120 / 161 (74.5% make) . . . 50+ yards 42 / 83 (50.6% make)

Graham Gano, career stats:  40-49 yards 74 / 92 (80.4% make) . . . 50+ yards 17 / 31 (54.8% make)

You can't blame Gano for not having a 20 year career yet.  But comparing him to Kasay, he's actually slightly better from long range, not quite as good from medium and short.  Pick your poison I guess.

 

But your numbers don't take the actual FGs into account and just gives ranges.  Moreover,  I said "more than most," not necessarily more than Gano.  

Even if Gano kicks another decade, at his current pace,  he still comes up substantially short of Kasay's sheer numbers which is quite impressive. 

Here's some more perspective. 

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/147745-the-little-giants-want-to-go-after-another-player/?do=findComment&comment=4450281

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Toomers said:

  Honestly. Can you show me a time where you DIDNT think whatever move was made was a good idea? Just one. Blind faith in every move the FO ever makes is unrealistic. 

Lots of moves I don't agree with. Like franchising Hardy for example given his instability. I didn't like getting rid of Benjamin initially even though it may have been a good move. The difference is I don't go in every thread bitching and moaning about every decision I don't agree with like some folks here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChibCU said:

And we had to sign an extra kicker for kick offs. Wasted roster position and salary cap. Also, Kasay's distance was diminished considerably at the end.

Agreed that Kasay did decline but finding good kickers aren't easy. Even after we let him go, the Saints signed him. That is why keeping Gano was a good move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thefuzz said:

It's a fuging joke about you guys who love making our players "the highest paid in the league" like that's some cool thing to do or something.

Making an average kicker the highest or second highest paid K in the league is stupid no matter which way you turn it....even more stupid...letting go of a much cheaper option just under a year ago that was under contract.

 

 

Not if he was one of the best kickers right now which based on 2017 he was. If he sucks in 2018 you might have a point but until then you got nothing. Keep in mind that while his contract is higher because he just signed, in a year or two he will be a bargain if he continues to.perform as he did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Lots of moves I don't agree with. Like franchising Hardy for example given his instability. I didn't like getting rid of Benjamin initially even though it may have been a good move. The difference is I don't go in every thread bitching and moaning about every decision I don't agree with like some folks here.

Well I wasn’t around for the Hardy tag. So you have 1(or2) over 4-5 years? But you defend every move(or 99.9%) in those same threads. Yes or No? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...