Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carlos Hyde?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Has played most of his career on a horrible San Fran offense. He is a hammer and I think better days could be ahead for him. The question is what would he command in free agency and could we afford it? I think he is as good a option as any back not Barkley in this class. Thoughts?

F456E698-51AA-4FCE-864A-574D6D7624D3.png

3EF76366-340A-4F52-9FC4-BDFE93D0D726.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isiah Crowell. If we draft a RB in the first two rounds i'm losing my poo. Then again depends on what we do in FA. I think secondary and DE in the first two rounds would be more important. We still have CAP. why draft another running back if we did the same thing three years ago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Jeremy Hill as a better value signing... can prob get em cheaper than Hyde and they’re pretty identical (same 40 time and both drafted in 2014). Feel like cincy had a shitty offensive line and he’d flourish with the run/pass option that Cam presents. I still think we draft a rb in the 3rd/4th and then we’re probably set for the next couple years with CMC’s versatility as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...