Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steelers Expected to Cut Mike Mitchell


Seltzer

Recommended Posts

Just now, thebigcat said:

We've got nothing back there

It's true, but considering how things played out with our secondary last year, it's hard to envision not being to get better even with cutting Coleman & trading Worley.  We were near the top in sacks & QB pressures last year, and our secondary still got exposed badly.

But yeah I'm more worried about our secondary than even our WR corp.  Cam has made hay with some mediocre groups before, but our secondary kept us from being a true SB contender IMHO more than anything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catufb85 said:

Lets just resign all the former players.

It didn't work out so bad last year lol... seriously though I think Mitchell would be an asset given our huge hole at safety and in the secondary in general right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I'm personally against it. Rather we go Round 1 Safety than sign him again.

He's being released because he honestly kind of sucks now. 

We badly need depth at safety anyways. I agree with this very good S group in the draft we better come away with at least 1 in the first 3 rounds (I hope we get 2) but that doesn’t keep us from adding veteran depth too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

We badly need depth at safety anyways. I agree with this very good S group in the draft we better come away with at least 1 in the first 3 rounds (I hope we get 2) but that doesn’t keep us from adding veteran depth too.

As a vet min signing I'm fine with it, but Mitchell has made too many boneheaded plays for the steelers since he left us that the fans are all too happy to get rid of him. He's constantly flagged for doing dumb stuff, runs his mouth too much and can't back it up. 

At least Norman backed his mouth up with his play. I'd much rather have his attitude back there than Mitchell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...