Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of failed physicals..


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Yeah NFL should look into that, I think that is dirty to do a player like that. Totally different than our situation, Breeland and his agent tried to keep his injury silent and that's bs.

It seems to me that it was more like Breeland didn't think the injury was a problem at all not anything nefarious. He was certainly wrong but I don't blame him for us getting screwed over. Just an unfortunate situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherCam213 said:

He knew he had an injury and stalled getting here to have it checked out,  Why delay if he didn't think it was a concern?

This. I thought it was weird that he didn't show to sign on Wednesday but I didn't think much into it. But based on what happened yesterday, I think he was 100% stalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yall are funny. Nothing will happen and there aren't any rules related to this anyway. This happens all the time plus there is no NFL wide physical standard. Teams pass people all the time who aren't actually healthy and fail other players based off previous injuries or any number of things if they think the future could be compromised. 

If you have had surgeries or even just minor injuries even within a year the effects will still be visible and most players could fail any scrutinized to the fullest physical just based on future "scares" because they are all fuged up under the microscope. Literally 0 that could be done to the Ravens. Dood was injured in week 15 and again in 17 so there is absolutely something to see on a scan at this point. Once again just because he passed a physical or 10 elsewhere doesn't mean anything and it never has.

Hell there could be a player who is flat footed and played 10 years injury free and go try to sign with another team and get failed because of that even if that is the only thing wrong with em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think the Ravens will see any repercussions from this, but I do absolutely think that Crabtree's sudden availability played a huge role in him "failing" his physical.

They had reached a 4 year/$29M agreement with grant with $14.5M guaranteed. They signed Crabtree to a 3 year/$21M deal with $11M guaranteed. I bet that contract looks virtually identical to the first three years of the Grant contract. They probably pretty much took Grant's deal and translated it into a 3 year deal for Crabtree due to his age.

If Crabtree didn't get cut I'd bet just about anything that Grant is a Raven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...