Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CO article with Ron Rivera


CarolinaSamurai

Recommended Posts

So Rivera fired Shula.

"I think my concern more so than anything else was finding another way to do things," Rivera said. "Finding a way to help Cam get to the next level. I thought we did a lot of good things with Mike. ... I mean, we went to the Super Bowl with him as our offensive coordinator.

"But I just think that Cam needed something different. Something extra."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

It was Gettleman who was making it difficult to move  on from Shula. It's why Gettleman was let go and  Shula was let go as soon as possible after Gettleman. Look where Shula landed.

Of course Rivera fired Shula.

I don't think that was the case at all. Gettleman showed clear frustrations with Shula and the offensive development last offseason after drafting McCaffrey. I distinctly remember him in a presser downplaying the term "evolution" in terms of what to expect out of our offense and it was pretty obvious that he wanted bigger changes than what was coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think that was the case at all. Gettleman showed clear frustrations with Shula and the offensive development last offseason after drafting McCaffrey. I distinctly remember him in a presser downplaying the term "evolution" in terms of what to expect out of our offense and it was pretty obvious that he wanted bigger changes than what was coming.

Just look at the evidence. It's clear as a bell. I dont claim it to be fact but a strong possibility based on what's plain to see.

Shula tenure was the Gettleman era. Then he follows Gettleman....weird huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It depends on what version of bad we are getting. Can't have the locker room tearing apart over it.
    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...