Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CO article with Ron Rivera


CarolinaSamurai

Recommended Posts

So Rivera fired Shula.

"I think my concern more so than anything else was finding another way to do things," Rivera said. "Finding a way to help Cam get to the next level. I thought we did a lot of good things with Mike. ... I mean, we went to the Super Bowl with him as our offensive coordinator.

"But I just think that Cam needed something different. Something extra."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

It was Gettleman who was making it difficult to move  on from Shula. It's why Gettleman was let go and  Shula was let go as soon as possible after Gettleman. Look where Shula landed.

Of course Rivera fired Shula.

I don't think that was the case at all. Gettleman showed clear frustrations with Shula and the offensive development last offseason after drafting McCaffrey. I distinctly remember him in a presser downplaying the term "evolution" in terms of what to expect out of our offense and it was pretty obvious that he wanted bigger changes than what was coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think that was the case at all. Gettleman showed clear frustrations with Shula and the offensive development last offseason after drafting McCaffrey. I distinctly remember him in a presser downplaying the term "evolution" in terms of what to expect out of our offense and it was pretty obvious that he wanted bigger changes than what was coming.

Just look at the evidence. It's clear as a bell. I dont claim it to be fact but a strong possibility based on what's plain to see.

Shula tenure was the Gettleman era. Then he follows Gettleman....weird huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's definitely a historical issue at QB but to be perfectly blunt, we also don't do a good job of really developing almost any position if you look at the last decade or so. I tend to be on the side of that being far less a development issue than an evaluation deficiency.  I think we are in the situation at QB2/3 recently due to the overall roster being absolutely abhorrent and the QB classes being quite thin. It is harder to justify another Matt Corral(or several) when you can potentially get a real two deep contributor at other positions.  But, it was a lot of hard work to get to the point where are roster is so incredibly bad that luxury picks literally are not in our vocabulary.  This is the reaping what you sow portion of our history.
    • That is what I meant about our front office. They are like someone filling out a March Madness bracket based on preference of uniform colors and mascots. There's no rhyme of reason to some of these fugg'n mind numbing decisions they make.  They go all in on these flimsy-@ss prospects and are gun shy when it comes to more solid prospects.  It's literally maddening and the reason I stopped being so emotionally involved in this team. Heck the only reason I'm active on the board today is one, it's my day off and two, it's cut down time.  
    • Search Carolina Panthers 2025 Cuts in google. eliminates the bs for you
×
×
  • Create New...