Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the 2015 Carolina Panthers throw, piss away, sell out Super Bowl 50?


Jangler

Recommended Posts

As Panther fans we've all the heard the BS. over and over and over...

 

and over.

 

Sound off here.

Personally I don't believe as an origination or to a player, they ...fumbled the game away... 

1. Shula

2. VM was out to prove he should have been the #1 pick

3. Shula

 

Happy Easter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

i am going to buy this domain from igo, implement a script that checks hashes of images before they're posted, and automatically strips this image out if anybody ever tries to post it

Sorry buddy the new owner of the Panthers bought this site already and he wants more 2 TE sets

This could have definitely helped CAM stay clean and get us in position to score pts instead of getting stripped sacked for fumble TD. 

 

KH6ilcP_-_Imgur.gif.4d936f49ac8d729218347e3405e553ab.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it--Rivera has never been great after a bye week.  The super bowl follows a bye week. 

The Super Bowl is more about adjustments and matchups than any other game.   How hard was it to find our biggest weakness (Remmers).  Put him against a motivated all-pro, we have no answers.

And yes, Shula sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Think about it--Rivera has never been great after a bye week.  The super bowl follows a bye week. 

The Super Bowl is more about adjustments and matchups than any other game.   How hard was it to find our biggest weakness (Remmers).  Put him against a motivated all-pro, we have no answers.

And yes, Shula sucked.

That and DG never gave him proper weapons.

Who was the #1 WR again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...