Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Super Bowl odds (Vegas)


PanthersATL

Recommended Posts

Some weird odds at the Vegas sports books this week:

  • MGM Resorts were all showing Carolina opening at 20/1, with 20/1 as current (4/2 date)
  • The Wynn showed Carolina opening at 25/1, with 28/1 as current (4/4 date)
  • But Caesars? Oh, they were more interesting....
    They opened at 30/1.  Their printed "current line" was 40/1.  I went up to the window.... and got them at 45/1.

In other words, it pays to shop around.  On the other hand, what does Caesars know that MGM/Wynn don't (or vice-versa)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care if it's an even year but we will have 10 or more wins again this year. Cam will have all off-season and Norv will help alot. Cam looked like he was finally coming around till all the wrs started getting hurt. I'm so glad we are looking at getting wrs and tes. We need it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RumHam said:

gotta love giving away money. Competition in the NFC will be the highest we've seen in some time this year. The AFC is a joke and if we were over there, it would be a different story. 

$20 to make $900? I'm good with that level of commitment. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

Westgate has them at 40/1.

In Vegas betting, Westgate and MGM have more similar numbers however 20/1 and 40/1 are way off.

That's why I thought it was weird. I was going strictly by the flyers, though. Not checking at the counter until Caesars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...