Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Hughes telling teams about sexual assault accusation at North Carolina


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Every year, a talented player begins to slip on draft night and people on the outside begin to wonder why.

Generally, it’s because the people on the inside are privy to information about character or injury concerns that aren’t widely known to the general public.

That was the case last year with Alabama linebacker Reuben Foster (a top-five talent who slid to the back of the first round and has since been arrested for three felony counts of domestic violence). But according to Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network, there doesn’t appear to be a case that dramatic this year, though there are some top prospects who have tried to state their cases with teams.

One example is Central Florida cornerback Mike Hughes. He has told teams that he reason he left North Carolina two years ago was a sexual assault allegation that did not lead to criminal charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the thread where people say, "Who cares?  etc."  Understand that there are more Rueben Fosters than there are Honey Badgers.  I played football in college and have friends who were NFL players.  We never disagree on the importance of character.  If there is a pattern, I would stay away.  If there is a once-in-a-lifetime screw up, if the player has been clean for years, I think you take the chance if you like his interview.

I also think contracts can be written to protect the team from stupidity.  But you lose the player and the pick if you draft a turd. 

The best predictor of the future is the past.  Does his play outweigh his risk?  The risk increases the higher the draft pick. 

Hughes could drop to us in the second round--I think I would take him there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

This is the thread where people say, "Who cares?  etc."  Understand that there are more Rueben Fosters than there are Honey Badgers.  I played football in college and have friends who were NFL players.  We never disagree on the importance of character.  If there is a pattern, I would stay away.  If there is a once-in-a-lifetime screw up, if the player has been clean for years, I think you take the chance if you like his interview.

I also think contracts can be written to protect the team from stupidity.  But you lose the player and the pick if you draft a turd. 

The best predictor of the future is the past.  Does his play outweigh his risk?  The risk increases the higher the draft pick. 

Hughes could drop to us in the second round--I think I would take him there. 

In the past this wouldn’t matter. People make false allegations to famous people all the time. The problem is that the culture has changed dramatically, really just in the last year. The #metoo movement and Harvey Weinstein incident is the reason for this change. The only problem I have with this situation and the major problem I find with these allegations is when someone falsely accuses someone they are still ruined and thought of a sexual predator. It’s also very hard to try to prove someone didn’t do something. So if they are innocent it's usually harder to prove than finding someone guilty.

 

someyhing else to think about is people who are known to sexually assault people don’t just assault someone once. It’s a bad character  flaw that someone will continue to do.

 

 In short  if Hughes was able to make it through college around lots of women without another allegation happening then it shouldn’t be a problem. If more allegations occurred then he shouldn’t be drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I know athletes can get special treatment, I don't put a lot of stock into charges that aren't filed. Allegations don't have to have any merit behind them to do damage. If you've ever had anyone accuse you of such a thing or know someone who has, you know how hard it is to prove that it's not true, and when you finally do, no one cares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

While I know athletes can get special treatment, I don't put a lot of stock into charges that aren't filed. Allegations don't have to have any merit behind them to do damage. If you've ever had anyone accuse you of such a thing or know someone who has, you know how hard it is to prove that it's not true, and when you finally do, no one cares. 

Remember that kid Brian Banks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...