Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Hughes telling teams about sexual assault accusation at North Carolina


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Every year, a talented player begins to slip on draft night and people on the outside begin to wonder why.

Generally, it’s because the people on the inside are privy to information about character or injury concerns that aren’t widely known to the general public.

That was the case last year with Alabama linebacker Reuben Foster (a top-five talent who slid to the back of the first round and has since been arrested for three felony counts of domestic violence). But according to Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network, there doesn’t appear to be a case that dramatic this year, though there are some top prospects who have tried to state their cases with teams.

One example is Central Florida cornerback Mike Hughes. He has told teams that he reason he left North Carolina two years ago was a sexual assault allegation that did not lead to criminal charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the thread where people say, "Who cares?  etc."  Understand that there are more Rueben Fosters than there are Honey Badgers.  I played football in college and have friends who were NFL players.  We never disagree on the importance of character.  If there is a pattern, I would stay away.  If there is a once-in-a-lifetime screw up, if the player has been clean for years, I think you take the chance if you like his interview.

I also think contracts can be written to protect the team from stupidity.  But you lose the player and the pick if you draft a turd. 

The best predictor of the future is the past.  Does his play outweigh his risk?  The risk increases the higher the draft pick. 

Hughes could drop to us in the second round--I think I would take him there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

This is the thread where people say, "Who cares?  etc."  Understand that there are more Rueben Fosters than there are Honey Badgers.  I played football in college and have friends who were NFL players.  We never disagree on the importance of character.  If there is a pattern, I would stay away.  If there is a once-in-a-lifetime screw up, if the player has been clean for years, I think you take the chance if you like his interview.

I also think contracts can be written to protect the team from stupidity.  But you lose the player and the pick if you draft a turd. 

The best predictor of the future is the past.  Does his play outweigh his risk?  The risk increases the higher the draft pick. 

Hughes could drop to us in the second round--I think I would take him there. 

In the past this wouldn’t matter. People make false allegations to famous people all the time. The problem is that the culture has changed dramatically, really just in the last year. The #metoo movement and Harvey Weinstein incident is the reason for this change. The only problem I have with this situation and the major problem I find with these allegations is when someone falsely accuses someone they are still ruined and thought of a sexual predator. It’s also very hard to try to prove someone didn’t do something. So if they are innocent it's usually harder to prove than finding someone guilty.

 

someyhing else to think about is people who are known to sexually assault people don’t just assault someone once. It’s a bad character  flaw that someone will continue to do.

 

 In short  if Hughes was able to make it through college around lots of women without another allegation happening then it shouldn’t be a problem. If more allegations occurred then he shouldn’t be drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I know athletes can get special treatment, I don't put a lot of stock into charges that aren't filed. Allegations don't have to have any merit behind them to do damage. If you've ever had anyone accuse you of such a thing or know someone who has, you know how hard it is to prove that it's not true, and when you finally do, no one cares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

While I know athletes can get special treatment, I don't put a lot of stock into charges that aren't filed. Allegations don't have to have any merit behind them to do damage. If you've ever had anyone accuse you of such a thing or know someone who has, you know how hard it is to prove that it's not true, and when you finally do, no one cares. 

Remember that kid Brian Banks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...