Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Trade Pick #88 For Pick #101 and #147


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I suggest you get over it 

Posted by someone in another thread that proves my concern that I always have on trading out of rounds 2-3.....

I found this on another site, and it's a few years old, but it's interesting.  This table shows how many players make the roster for a team, by the round they're drafted in, and whether they're on the team in year 2, 3, etc...  It uses data from 2004-2014.

Round Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
1 99.7% 93.5% 83.9% 77.4% 71.0%
2 96.8% 96.1% 83.9% 74.2% 41.9%
3 96.9% 75.1% 62.5% 37.5% 18.8%
4 91.4% 74.3% 54.3% 34.3% 17.2%
5 81.1% 56.8% 37.8% 24.3% 16.2%
6 70.2% 57.5% 35.3% 20.9% 10.6%
7 58.3% 45.8% 31.3%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, methodsofmadness said:

Josh Sweat DE Florida St- Again, depth but also could be a good replacement for Peppers after he retires

Don’t know why many of you want to draft 3-4 edge OLBs to play DE in a 4-3.

So they can play with their hand in the dirt and get repeatedly pancaked by NFL OTs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Don’t know why many of you want to draft 3-4 edge OLBs to play DE in a 4-3.

So they can play with their hand in the dirt and get repeatedly pancaked by NFL OTs?

Gotta filter out the people who clearly don't know poo about football and decide who to respond to mate.....

Edit: they could also just be channeling their inner Hurney trying to convert people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind us trading back as much as I wish we would have got a little more value out of it.

As others have said we lost about 20 points of value on a 150 point pick.  I;m surprised we didn't try to get Green Bay's last pick in the 5th (174) which is worth about 20 points.

Here is a chart that includes values for the comp picks

http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

If anything we could have thrown in our 7th (234) if needed.

88 and 234 for 101, 147, and 174 would work out a lot closer on the chart.  

On a positive note though I like having the first pick of a new draft day.  I wouldn't be surprised if we trade down again.  You have all night to talk to teams and they have all night to convince themselves its worth it.  I wouldn't trade down much, our board has got to be getting sparse, but it doesn't hurt anything to trade down if you are confident you can get the same person plus a free pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Gotta filter out the people who clearly don't know poo about football and decide who to respond to mate.....

Edit: they could also just be channeling their inner Hurney trying to convert people.

Or for me, I was clearly stating who was best available. It does not mean we will draft them but from a Hurney point-of-view, I could see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheRed said:

After reading the huddle the last 24 hours. One thing is abundantly clear. We still have one of the worst fanbases in the league. What a bunch of babies.

And when Cam retires you won't be a part of the worst fanbase so alls well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

Lots of people are posting as if trading down is inherently bad. It's not. Depends on who wanted the trade and what we get and about 100 other things.

Having said that we got a TE that had 28 yards at Indiana last year.

 

376.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...