Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team rebranding apparently possible, even rename


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Better not. Panthers black and blue is the ultimate mascot. Change that and I’m out 

I have no idea what they're looking for, or looking at - just that they're looking. I strongly doubt they'd f*ck with the colors, though - it's something they definitely got right, and usually the last thing to change in a sports rebrand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be pissed if they change anything. It would be stupid. They've spent 20+ years building a successful brand.

To pay the most for a professional sports team in US history and then destroy the brand would be the dumbest thing ever.

The Bobcats brand was horrible, but in fairness to Bob Johnson, he didn't have the option to keep the beloved Hornets brand, and it took 10 years to fix that.

I have zero interest in team not being the Carolina Panthers and keeping the black and blue. That and trying to move the stadium would be the fastest way to alienate someone like me who's had PSLs for almost 15 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RetiredCollegeCoach said:

 

External marketing resource. This is very initial - sort of RFP phase as I understand it. Rename considered very unlikely but absolutely everything is in play. They are soliciting help for an overall refresh when the sale is complete.

Nice troll bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...