Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thanks to Tepper, Mr. Coleman has business cards


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

CHARLOTTE – One of the first Carolina Panthers employees David Tepper met was security officer and team ambassador John Coleman, who mans the front desk at Bank of America Stadium.

During a site visit in the midst of the bidding process, Tepper and Coleman hit it off, which is what generally happens when anyone comes into contact with the affable greeter who has worked for the Panthers since 1996.

https://www.panthers.com/news/thanks-to-tepper-mr-coleman-has-business-cards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Doesn't appear to be a professional camera...

Watch the video. There’s a second camera person there waiting with pro gear taking stills. Doesn’t mean Tepper isn’t a great guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tbe said:

Don’t get me wrong, It’s a nice story. But wasn’t it nice for those cameras to just happened to be there to capture it all....

In today's society, when isn't their a camera around?

I get what your saying but it would be foolish of the Panthers PR team to not take advantage of that interaction.

More good than harm will come out of it regardless of whether it was a photo op or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know half those cards are just going into the "Win your office a free lunch" fishbowl at the local Applebee's.

Question is -- does "the office" include all the players? 'Cause that would be a bit of an expensive fishbowl drawing for the restaurant....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...