Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sirles to I.R, does Robinson start at RT week 1?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Can’t believe they decided to send Sirles to Injured reserve with a hamstring injury.

Moton looks like the starter at LT while Kalil is out. Williams and Robinson who we just traded for are the only othe tackles on the roster. 

Any chance Williams is ready to go week 1? If not Robinson has to start right? 

On the bright side he must be better than Clausell and Bisnowoty, however that isn’t saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

Yeah, this is a real concern.  Despite people wanting some sort of savior to come from cuts or a trade, the chances of anyone giving up a serviceable OT at this point is very small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

That part doesn't bother me.

21 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

That does.

We're thinner than an anorexic supermodel right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1. For now Robinson is the guy. He'd better be 100%.

And who's behind Moton and Robinson?!

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KB_fan said:

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1.

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Word that they're not gonna IR Williams. Don't think it was ever an option for Kalil.

Barring another move, this is what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would you just fuging quit trying to make us like him? That is his job, not yours.  Thank you. 
    • Rookie season being key to uour argument. I didn't at all mislead about the talent Cam had to work with. Kalil was a great center. Olsen was a great TE. Our WRs were probably the worst in the league. Cam still won MVP, we went 15-1, and we went to the SB. Your attempt to bring up Cam to defend Bryce is desperate and clownish. Bryce has more talent to work with and has done WAY less.
    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
×
×
  • Create New...