Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snap Counts: vs. Giants


beastson

Recommended Posts

Chris Clark 71 (100%) 7 (22%)
Greg Van Roten 71 (100%) 7 (22%)
Trai Turner 71 (100%) 7 (22%)
Taylor Moton 71 (100%) 7 (22%)
Cam Newton 71 (100%)  
Christian McCaffrey 69 (97%)  
Ryan Kalil 61 (86%)  
Devin Funchess 51 (72%)  
Ian Thomas 49 (69%) 10 (31%)
Torrey Smith 46 (65%)  
Chris Manhertz 37 (52%) 14 (44%)
Jarius Wright 30 (42%) 3 (9%)
D.J. Moore 29 (41%) 3 (9%)
Damiere Byrd 13 (18%) 15 (47%)
Curtis Samuel 12 (17%) 12 (38%)
Alex Armah 10 (14%) 10 (31%)
Tyler Larsen 10 (14%) 7 (22%)
C.J. Anderson 8 (11%)  
Amini Silatolu 2 (3%) 7 (22%)

 

Donte Jackson 56 (100%) 14 (44%)
James Bradberry 56 (100%) 6 (19%)
Shaq Thompson 56 (100%) 5 (16%)
Luke Kuechly 56 (100%) 5 (16%)
Mike Adams 56 (100%) 5 (16%)
Eric Reid 48 (86%)  
Captain Munnerlyn 40 (71%)  
Kawann Short 38 (68%) 5 (16%)
Mario Addison 38 (68%)  
Julius Peppers 37 (66%) 5 (16%)
Dontari Poe 26 (46%)  
Kyle Love 25 (45%)  
Wes Horton 19 (34%) 5 (16%)
Efe Obada 18 (32%) 19 (59%)
David Mayo 14 (25%) 25 (78%)
Vernon Butler 14 (25%) 5 (16%)
Jermaine Carter 11 (20%) 20 (62%)
Rashaan Gaulden 8 (14%) 8 (25%)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

This seems odd to me.

I got the impression he played on the regular defense much more than this.

Yeah he looked good out there too, was surprised to see this number so low since I just kept seeing him in on plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...