Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3rd Q. Cam last second decides not to throw a wide open TD.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Ouch. Just saw this on twitter. 

Anyhow, it’s clear Cam was off his game last week, but the All-22 is brutal. We had missed opportunities, but man this just stinks to see. Cam even anticipated him.

Yeah sure. You can argue he “felt pressure,” but you can’t defend him with that too much as he only was pressured 3 times total. This should’ve been a TD.

And I’m the biggest Cam defender on here. But this was weird to see him so off and seeing ghosts Sunday. I’m sure he’s definitely on top of it this week.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 1 of about 4 throws I had to rub my eyes and make sure I was watching Cam playing quarterback. 

He was definitely off.

  • He missed a wide open CMC a couple drives after Giants scored. Instead threw INC to T. Smith in double coverage.
  • He threw a back shoulder throw on a go route to Samuel after he destroyed his man off the LOS, over the top and that is a walk-in TD
  • As I mentioned before: 2nd INT had an easy YAC play for Moore, but instead threw an errant pass to IT
  • Threw behind Funch on a 3rd and long when he had his man beat could of easily been a 20 yard gain.

Just wasn't his day. He is our QB and a great QB. Sometimes you just have a bad day. Hopefully we leave that in week 5.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Definitely Not Trolling said:

Looked like he was worried about a strip sack from behind. 

What I’m thinking but the guy was still comfortably far enough away and Cam’s thrown through much worse.

Just uncharacteristic overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam looked very pedestrian on Sunday, he missed McCaffrey multiple times out of the backfield on plays that would have led to huge gains.

We got so caught up in the score that we forgot the first 17 points were due to Gano, Moore/Samuel ridiculous plays, and special teams. Outside of a few plays the offense was anemic.

Honestly the way Cam and the offense looked, if Rivera has Cam out there slinging the ball around then we may very well have lost that game due to three and outs, interceptions, etc.

That’s the mark of good QB though, just find a way to get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Giants were never up 20-16

2) This is the kind of crap that’s going to happen on occasion when you spend all off season and pre season drilling it into his head to take the check down every single time.

I have no idea why this organization doesn’t just trade Cam for Alex Smith and some draft picks. It’s clear they want no part of a play making QB, just look at the type of WR’s they surround him with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

1) Giants were never up 20-16

2) This is the kind of crap that’s going to happen on occasion when you spend all off season and pre season drilling it into his head to take the check down every single time.

I have no idea why this organization doesn’t just trade Cam for Alex Smith and some draft picks. It’s clear they want no part of a play making QB, just look at the type of WR’s they surround him with. 

Derpaddy derp derp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Definitely Not Trolling said:

Yes, he played like crap in the passing game. But at least he dominated the run game to even it out

To be fair he was probably average passing wise. Issue is he’s normally elite imo so far this season so this is a low for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...