Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess what grade PFF gave Cam this week?


TN05

Recommended Posts

I’ve seen 2 touchdowns 2 ints and less than 200 yards passing be 85 PFF and in the 80s QBR before(Wilson) 

Numbers don’t lie but people lie about numbers constantly— how they gear the equation for their metric, what they draw from for their stat etc.

We won the game convincingly, and Cam convincingly walked drive after drive into scoring range, and punched touchdowns and position for fieldgoals with ease,..

put that in your metric and smoke it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me why anyone pays any attention PFF grades. Great source for stat aggreggation, pathetic for grades.

 

Like I said, it’s who and how that team uses what they determine in their metrics and to the weighting etc.

what if the receiver runs the wrong route and the quarterback throws where the receiver was supposed to be, and it’s an interception.

quarterback gets laid out, but the team knows what happened.

do they choose passes that were “on target” by a “batters box” around the receiver? 

What if the play was a complete cluster but worked out like many are? 

Who decides on that box and did they choose it the same way for each quarterback? 

What weighting do they give a pass that’s on target but dropped, versus a pass that’s terrible but caught anyway?

stuff like that— the team knows— and if the team released metrics they designed to measure their own players against film and plays they know to be true maybe it could work.

everyone else just watches with the ignorant eye and throws pie or flamethrowers without knowing what really happened or was supposed to happen.

in short— metrics are flawed by biased people—

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...