Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Says The Panthers Only have a 35% Chance to Win Thursday Night vs Pittsburgh? Do You Agree With This?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

The Steelers deserve to be the favorites at home on a short week. But I think the Panthers have a great shot at winning this one especially if they can’t get out to an early lead and force Pittsburgh to be one dimensional on offense. Pittsburgh’s defense is kinda bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know they say that all men are created equal, but you look at the Panthers and you look at the Steelers and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another football team, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But the Panthers are genetic freaks and they're not normal! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat them. Then you add Norv Turner to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the game on Thursday, Steelers got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but the Panthers, they got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because Mike Tomlin KNOWS he can't beat the Panthers and he's not even gonna try!
 
So Steelers, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus our 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning on Thursday. But then you take the Panthers 75% chance of winning, if they were to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cent, the Panthers got 141 2/3 chance of winning on Thursday. See Steelers, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

Pittsburgh’s defense is kinda bad.

Their run D is ahead of us by 2 spots, and their pass D is two spots and 7 yds/gm behind us. They're not blowing teams out (aside from the Falcons game) but they're getting the job done. They're a league best 25-7 at Heinz Field  in primetime games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers are incredibly tough at home.  Put it on a short week and it's going to be a very hard game for us.  It's going to come down to our defense.  If they can keep us in this, we can pull it out, but we really need those guys to show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers average 86.4 penalty yards per game this season. They are a dirty football team and have gotten away with taking some shots at Cam in the past. Let's see how that holds up now. They are the most penalized (yardage) team in the league.

110.8 yds on the road and 62 at home, which shows you the refs are willing to put flags in their pocket when the Steelers play at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the idea that we don't do good on short weeks or against Pittsburgh. I hate the percentage prediction stats. It's a fake stat. Teams that have 1% chance of winning and then they do really hurts that metric. It's a stupid metric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, caatfan said:

Their run D is ahead of us by 2 spots, and their pass D is two spots and 7 yds/gm behind us. They're not blowing teams out (aside from the Falcons game) but they're getting the job done. They're a league best 25-7 at Heinz Field  in primetime games. 

Sure but they've also faced the Browns and Ravens for half of their games so far and those teams suck ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, rodeo said:

You know they say that all men are created equal, but you look at the Panthers and you look at the Steelers and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another football team, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But the Panthers are genetic freaks and they're not normal! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat them. Then you add Norv Turner to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the game on Thursday, Steelers got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but the Panthers, they got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because Mike Tomlin KNOWS he can't beat the Panthers and he's not even gonna try!
 
So Steelers, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus our 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning on Thursday. But then you take the Panthers 75% chance of winning, if they were to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cent, the Panthers got 141 2/3 chance of winning on Thursday. See Steelers, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice.

Math scholars are still trying to figure this out. Big Poppa Pump draggin bitches through the dirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thursday night games are a toss up and whoever wins or loses doesn’t mean much in my opinion. Three days recovery time is not enough time and the winner is usually whoever happens to recover faster - not who is the better team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...