Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A tale of two coaches


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Tomlin and Rivera are both "player's coaches".  They both like to pound it in the ground game.  They both have a big, strong-armed QB.  They both have a few issues on defense.  They both had 3 days to prepare for each other.  The teams were pretty even going in, but the Steelers had a tough game on Sunday vs.  the Ravens, while the Panthers struggled to hang onto a 35-7 lead (that dwindled to 35-28 in the fourth quarter) at home vs. the lowly Buccaneers.  We could have rested a few players in the second half vs Tampa on a short week,  but not in the RR era.

Tomlin and the Steelers got up on us early, and never let up--they went for the throat. I saw a composed team who took the lead and buried us.  Why can't the Panthers do that against lesser teams than Carolina?  Why, for years, have we never been able to effectively hold a lead? Sure, we win a lot of close games, but many were blowouts until late.  Why can't we put teams away like Pittsburgh did to us?

The difference between a leader and a pretender is hard to define, but it is a thing.  I think Tomlin smells blood in the water and attacks, while we see the lead and gulp over losing it.  The Steelers were aggressive and hungry with the lead---I thought,, "Man, why do we not do that?"  Meanwhile, on the other side of the field from Tomlin, RR is throwing the red flag in the second quarter to challenge a bad spot on first down because he saw a bad spot on the JumboTron.  Can y'all not see the difference? 

Here, our talented players get the lead, and then the coaches get involved to preserve it. They start working the clock, calling conservative plays, and other things that break momentum and abort the pace and strategy that got the lead.  How that happens is a reflection on the coach. I speak of a pattern, one that was obvious to me last night when I saw a real coach get a lead who knew what to do with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Ive never been that high on Tomlin but he deserves a lot of credit. Our team would be a trainwreck if our best player was playing the games Bell was playing

Why? Bell didn't show up, which definitely was significant, but after that who cares? They answer a few questions about it but it's not like Bell's there messing up practices or something. I'm not a huge fan of Rivera the coach but he's navigated the team through plenty of significant 'disctractions.' I think what went down with JR and Gettleman were just as significant as Bell, moreso in the case of JR, and the team wasn't a trainwreck.

I also don't agree that Bell is their best player, and even if he is he's apparently not important enough to keep the team from winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

The difference between a leader and a pretender is hard to define, but it is a thing.  I think Tomlin smells blood in the water and attacks, while we see the lead and gulp over losing it.  The Steelers were aggressive and hungry with the lead---I thought,, "Man, why do we not do that?"  Meanwhile, on the other side of the field from Tomlin, RR is throwing the red flag in the second quarter to challenge a bad spot on first down because he saw a bad spot on the JumboTron.  Can y'all not see the difference? 

You must not watch many Steelers games if you think this was a blood in the water situation. Also, Im sure if we were playing against a team and averaging 10+ per play and throw only 3 incompletions, we would have done the same thing. Dolphins last year maybe?

Btw Tomlin is not the coach you are portraying him to be. He does not have that locker room under control, they just have a hell of a lot of talent, and a QB that procures that offense. The only difference I saw last night was one DC with an awesome gameplan, and another playing Russian roulette with his PB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All great coaches now days that understand the way the league and it's rules and design are headed do this.

Patriots

Steelers

Eagles

Saints

Hell even the Chiefs and Bengals aren't going to let up and will play with urgency.

And teams who do this, are winning now days. Coaches who aren't may win but won't be consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it over and over, the way the Panthers have been investing in offense is as if they understand what I posted above, but refuse to consistently game plan around letting the offense take over and win games. Having the defense play they way they do as if they'll win a game for instance. All the teams above will score 30+ points most of the time. I am not sure Rivera is the coach the personnel and direction the NFL is going.

That said, even while I believe the Panthers should be shifting to the offense winning games for us, there is no excuse for the defense giving up that many points last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tale of 2 depth charts,..

the steelers have 3 times as many legit starters as we do and 75% of their depth players would be starters for the Panthers,...

so they could rotate fresh constantly for the weekend game and this game without missing a beat.

remember when they showed down a little later in the first half? Backup tightends, fullbacks and running back rotations?

our team has to play every best guy every down to have a chance— we have no backup players.

CJ sitting is criminal but CMac is just that good. Even he should be able to sit some— and obviously he got throttled trying to block like he’s Stewart or something—

depth gents,.. we have none and that’s why our team looked so outclassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Tale of 2 depth charts,..

the steelers have 3 times as many legit starters as we do and 75% of their depth players would be starters for the Panthers,...

so they could rotate fresh constantly for the weekend game and this game without missing a beat.

remember when they showed down a little later in the first half? Backup tightends, fullbacks and running back rotations?

our team has to play every best guy every down to have a chance— we have no backup players.

CJ sitting is criminal but CMac is just that good. Even he should be able to sit some— and obviously he got throttled trying to block like he’s Stewart or something—

depth gents,.. we have none and that’s why our team looked so outclassed.

Typical Hurney built team.  He can find a few good starters but he has never in his life been able to build adequate depth.  

#GetARealGM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...