Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A tale of two coaches


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Tomlin and Rivera are both "player's coaches".  They both like to pound it in the ground game.  They both have a big, strong-armed QB.  They both have a few issues on defense.  They both had 3 days to prepare for each other.  The teams were pretty even going in, but the Steelers had a tough game on Sunday vs.  the Ravens, while the Panthers struggled to hang onto a 35-7 lead (that dwindled to 35-28 in the fourth quarter) at home vs. the lowly Buccaneers.  We could have rested a few players in the second half vs Tampa on a short week,  but not in the RR era.

Tomlin and the Steelers got up on us early, and never let up--they went for the throat. I saw a composed team who took the lead and buried us.  Why can't the Panthers do that against lesser teams than Carolina?  Why, for years, have we never been able to effectively hold a lead? Sure, we win a lot of close games, but many were blowouts until late.  Why can't we put teams away like Pittsburgh did to us?

The difference between a leader and a pretender is hard to define, but it is a thing.  I think Tomlin smells blood in the water and attacks, while we see the lead and gulp over losing it.  The Steelers were aggressive and hungry with the lead---I thought,, "Man, why do we not do that?"  Meanwhile, on the other side of the field from Tomlin, RR is throwing the red flag in the second quarter to challenge a bad spot on first down because he saw a bad spot on the JumboTron.  Can y'all not see the difference? 

Here, our talented players get the lead, and then the coaches get involved to preserve it. They start working the clock, calling conservative plays, and other things that break momentum and abort the pace and strategy that got the lead.  How that happens is a reflection on the coach. I speak of a pattern, one that was obvious to me last night when I saw a real coach get a lead who knew what to do with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Ive never been that high on Tomlin but he deserves a lot of credit. Our team would be a trainwreck if our best player was playing the games Bell was playing

Why? Bell didn't show up, which definitely was significant, but after that who cares? They answer a few questions about it but it's not like Bell's there messing up practices or something. I'm not a huge fan of Rivera the coach but he's navigated the team through plenty of significant 'disctractions.' I think what went down with JR and Gettleman were just as significant as Bell, moreso in the case of JR, and the team wasn't a trainwreck.

I also don't agree that Bell is their best player, and even if he is he's apparently not important enough to keep the team from winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

The difference between a leader and a pretender is hard to define, but it is a thing.  I think Tomlin smells blood in the water and attacks, while we see the lead and gulp over losing it.  The Steelers were aggressive and hungry with the lead---I thought,, "Man, why do we not do that?"  Meanwhile, on the other side of the field from Tomlin, RR is throwing the red flag in the second quarter to challenge a bad spot on first down because he saw a bad spot on the JumboTron.  Can y'all not see the difference? 

You must not watch many Steelers games if you think this was a blood in the water situation. Also, Im sure if we were playing against a team and averaging 10+ per play and throw only 3 incompletions, we would have done the same thing. Dolphins last year maybe?

Btw Tomlin is not the coach you are portraying him to be. He does not have that locker room under control, they just have a hell of a lot of talent, and a QB that procures that offense. The only difference I saw last night was one DC with an awesome gameplan, and another playing Russian roulette with his PB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All great coaches now days that understand the way the league and it's rules and design are headed do this.

Patriots

Steelers

Eagles

Saints

Hell even the Chiefs and Bengals aren't going to let up and will play with urgency.

And teams who do this, are winning now days. Coaches who aren't may win but won't be consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it over and over, the way the Panthers have been investing in offense is as if they understand what I posted above, but refuse to consistently game plan around letting the offense take over and win games. Having the defense play they way they do as if they'll win a game for instance. All the teams above will score 30+ points most of the time. I am not sure Rivera is the coach the personnel and direction the NFL is going.

That said, even while I believe the Panthers should be shifting to the offense winning games for us, there is no excuse for the defense giving up that many points last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tale of 2 depth charts,..

the steelers have 3 times as many legit starters as we do and 75% of their depth players would be starters for the Panthers,...

so they could rotate fresh constantly for the weekend game and this game without missing a beat.

remember when they showed down a little later in the first half? Backup tightends, fullbacks and running back rotations?

our team has to play every best guy every down to have a chance— we have no backup players.

CJ sitting is criminal but CMac is just that good. Even he should be able to sit some— and obviously he got throttled trying to block like he’s Stewart or something—

depth gents,.. we have none and that’s why our team looked so outclassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Tale of 2 depth charts,..

the steelers have 3 times as many legit starters as we do and 75% of their depth players would be starters for the Panthers,...

so they could rotate fresh constantly for the weekend game and this game without missing a beat.

remember when they showed down a little later in the first half? Backup tightends, fullbacks and running back rotations?

our team has to play every best guy every down to have a chance— we have no backup players.

CJ sitting is criminal but CMac is just that good. Even he should be able to sit some— and obviously he got throttled trying to block like he’s Stewart or something—

depth gents,.. we have none and that’s why our team looked so outclassed.

Typical Hurney built team.  He can find a few good starters but he has never in his life been able to build adequate depth.  

#GetARealGM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said this last night to family. You can look at Bryce as not a “strong and physical” presence and that’s not going to change on you can look at it, that this guy has the type of skillset that sets him up to only get better for the next 5-7 years every year. He’s not going to know less about the game next year than this year. His timing will be better, his pocket presence better (even though the guy works around a pocket amazingly in my opinion), everything is just going to improve every year and I believed he’s already proved the doubters wrong other than nut huggers on here who just want a big strong man to drool over.
    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
×
×
  • Create New...