Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You want to know why Moore and Samuel weren’t on the field together?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

Good god, Ron is a fugging idiot.

”Too many weapons on offense is bad!” proclaimed Mo-Ron Rivera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

 

All this time we’re thinking Samuel didn’t wear a tie or maybe he forgot to zip up and Ron saw his undies. 

You REALLY think that's the reason... You guys I tell yea... Norv has game planned differently almost every single game this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Person who also asked if Ron would like to get them on the field more and his response was 

“I want to see them continue to do the things they’re doing”. 

Ron is freaking killing me with this crap. There are plenty of coaches in this league who would kill for guys like Moore and Samuel and would figure out how to get them on the field AT THE SAME TIME. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

On Curtis Samuel’s 11 snaps when he was out on a pass play, Cam threw it to him 7 times.

Sounds like our QB is smart enough to know who needs the ball. I’m sure he can manage two exceptional receivers playing at the same time.

poo, I hate it when Saca is right and he is! :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron is paying for the Uber, Norv is the one actually driving. 

Do you guys seriously think Ron is on the sideline going, "hold on, hold on, get 12 out of this play, 10 is already out there".   Norv has final say on play construction, 90%+ of the game plan and 100% play calls.  That means he knows exactly who is on the field for that play.

I get (sort of) the condemnation of Ron for going for the road win,  but how long does Norv hold the halo you guys have constructed?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...