Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Hot is Hurneys Seat?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted

 

Rons seat  shouldnt be the only one on the hot seat.

Hurneys Leashe shouldve been short to begin with after his past time here.

Moore looks like a stud, but the dude fell in our lap.  Hard not to screw that up.  Jackson has been a hit.

But FA pieces

Not to compare to gettleman.  But Gettleman brought in Key guys who made impact.  Ginn, Coleman (pre injury) 

Hurneys FA pickups have been flops at the very best.  Nothing stands out that he should be certainly retained

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

 

Rons seat  shouldnt be the only one on the hot seat.

Hurneys Leashe shouldve been short to begin with after his past time here.

Moore looks like a stud, but the dude fell in our lap.  Hard not to screw that up.  Jackson has been a hit.

But FA pieces

Not to compare to gettleman.  But Gettleman brought in Key guys who made impact.  Ginn, Coleman (pre injury) 

Hurneys FA pickups have been flops at the very best.  Nothing stands out that he should be certainly retained

 

 

 

Name me one player who Gettleman brought via FA is having any type of impact this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

Hurney had a good draft and offseason.  He can't make Ron fire his shitty DC.

That being said, i would completely understand if Tepper just cleaned house and brought in his own guys...  but, i still think Hurney 2.0 has done a great job.  This team's failures lie at the feet of the coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted

I think Hurney is gone this offseason through no fault of his own.  His moves since returning have been a net positive for the franchise, regardless of what he did in his prior stint here.  His biggest issue has been the albatross of a contract we gave Matt Kalil.  While it was not on his watch, it certainly limited his flexibility. 

Given what he's done this time around, he may actually get a shot somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...