Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Eldest Panthers - Who do you keep?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here is a list of the eldest Panthers currently on the roster posted on Panthers.com, from oldest to youngest, 30 years old or older. 


Julius Peppers
Mike Adams
Thomas Davis
Chris Clark
Greg Olsen
Kalil_Ryan
J.J. Jansen
Kyle Love
Graham Gano
Mario Addison
Colin Jones
Marshall Newhouse
Da'Norris Searcy
Amini Silatolu
Captain Munnerlyn
Ben Jacobs

 

Who on this list do you want to see return in 2019?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen if he is good to go. At least when he's healthy he's still one of the best. Love because he was our best DT. Addison because we need at least one able body at DE.  TD in a reduced role only because I think we should move on from Shaq. Newhouse as backup until new talent passes him. That's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Love- Keep, dude has been a stud rotational DT, only one to play worth a dam this year

 

Addison- unless you can use his cap to help sign a big FA like Clowney 

Chris Clark- solid Depth, you always need depth on the OL

Gano- have to keep because itll cost more to cut

Olsen- im still on board givng him another year, I think he'll retire after next year anways, especially if he has 1 more injury

TD- offer him a LB Coach job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Here is a list of the eldest Panthers currently on the roster posted on Panthers.com, from oldest to youngest, 30 years old or older. 


Julius Peppers
Mike Adams
Thomas Davis
Chris Clark
Greg Olsen
Kalil_Ryan
J.J. Jansen
Kyle Love

Graham Gano
Mario Addison
Colin Jones
Marshall Newhouse
Da'Norris Searcy
Amini Silatolu
Captain Munnerlyn
Ben Jacobs

 

Who on this list do you want to see return in 2019?
 

The 3 in bold is the only ones I would re-sign.  The rest I would seriously look to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Here is a list of the eldest Panthers currently on the roster posted on Panthers.com, from oldest to youngest, 30 years old or older. 


Julius Peppers
Mike Adams
Thomas Davis
Chris Clark
Greg Olsen
Kalil_Ryan
J.J. Jansen
Kyle Love
Graham Gano
Mario Addison
Colin Jones
Marshall Newhouse
Da'Norris Searcy
Amini Silatolu
Captain Munnerlyn
Ben Jacobs

 

Who on this list do you want to see return in 2019?
 

The issue isn't simply who you keep so much as who do you keep at what price and who is under contract. For example Searcy is already under contract this year and will cost roughly 3.4 million to keep and 625000 to cut.  So can you upgrade for 2.8 million or not in the safety market? Particularly if you spend a bunch to sign Reid.  Who is going to start or backup? Are we paying starter money or backup money? It isn't Madden where you just pick who you want without concern for cost and what else is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazingly, we have basically no one to back up most of these guys, we don't have a ton of money to spend on free agents and you don't want Hurney and Rivera deciding who to sign, anyway.  It's not good.  Some of these guys are still productive (Love, Adams, Davis to an extent, Olsen *IF* healthy), so I'd be ok signing a few of them on team-friendly deals, but that may be wishful thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Little Goody Two Shoes said:

Olsen, Gano, Addison and possibly Jacobs. But I'd try to find a young kicker to unseat Gano in camp.

Getting rid of Gano will cost more in dead cap to replace him than keep him. Plus you have to pay who you replace him with. So why would you spend almost 2 million more to replace him with an rookie than keep him? Or a lot more than 2 million if you replace him with an established kicker That is the analysis you need to make with each player before simply saying who you would keep or replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Getting rid of Gano will cost more in dead cap to replace him than keep him. Plus you have to pay who you replace him with. So why would you spend almost 2 million more to replace him with an rookie than keep him? Or a lot more than 2 million if you replace him with an established kicker That is the analysis you need to make with each player before simply saying who you would keep or replace.

Yeah, its not like you can just draft a 7th round kicker for cheap to out perform him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Yeah, its not like you can just draft a 7th round kicker for cheap to out perform him.

Again let's say you try. It will cost you roughly 4.6 million to cut Gano and another 650000 to sign the rookie or 5.2 million to do that or 3.7 million to keep him.  Next year his cap hit will be more than his dead cap hit so if he doesn't have a good 2019 it would be a good idea to do what you suggest as least financially. That is the point. You have to look at the bigger picture and you know that  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Again let's say you try. It will cost you roughly 4.6 million to cut Gano and another 650000 to sign the rookie or 5.2 million to do that or 3.7 million to keep him.  Next year his cap hit will be more than his dead cap hit so if he doesn't have a good 2019 it would be a good idea to do what you suggest as least financially. That is the point. You have to look at the bigger picture and you know that  

Sure I do. I also know that it is fine to talk about just performance and who fans would want back on the team based on that. Not every conversation has to entail every complexity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Sure I do. I also know that it is fine to talk about just performance and who fans would want back on the team based on that. Not every conversation has to entail every complexity.

Especially if you want to just focus on controversy like bringing up Butkurs or want to focus on fluff instead of actual football conversation which includes those complexities. Just shows how far this joint had devolved over the.last few years as we go for clicks over content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Especially if you want to just focus on controversy like bringing up Butkurs or want to focus on fluff instead of actual football conversation which includes those complexities. Just shows how far this joint had devolved over the.last few years as we go for clicks over content.

We are all very impressed by your big brain, brad.

We have always had this discussion and ones like them for the past 15 years, just as you have always tried to show everyone how much you think you know. Some things, they never change. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There are several posters that only post negative at all times.   8 wins is a big jump from 5 and we still have 2 games.  Jaguars have a much more talented roster than us and have underachieved for years. 
    • All of this noise is just setting us up to lose Week 18 and proclaim life's not fair. If there's one thing I know in my 30+ years of watching the Hornets and Panthers, is that the bad guy always wins in the end. A team can be falling apart internally but we will still lose to them. A team's fanbase can be extra shitty and cocky and they will just win anyway. It always happens
    • Well even if we took diverging paths getting there...our overall assessment of Shough is the same (bolded) lol so I guess that's what matters.  What you call "playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter" is the same thing I'm referencing when I talk about his poise.  Although I still wonder how truly "bad" of a team the Saints are.  Their defense is middle-of-the-road, and their offense does have some good pieces (Olave, Juwan Johnson) outside of running back which is the position most everyone agrees is relatively plug-and-play.  I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the majority of NFL team's o-lines lol but I'm assuming Saints are not great there, although Shough's pressure % seems to have been quite low (and steadily improving) over the last four weeks (20 -> 16.7 -> 15.0 -> 13.0) so maybe they've been playing better as of late, or perhaps Shough himself deserves credit for that.   Some of the language I'm hearing about Shough, including talking about how he's way above league average in several categories, makes it sound like Shough is having a rookie season on par with like a CJ Stroud who established himself as basically a Top 5-10 QB his rookie season.  Maybe that's on me though, I don't mean to attribute anything to you that I'm sure you don't agree with.
×
×
  • Create New...