Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Every conversation turns into a bitchfest because there is nothing else to talk about for the next year until something relevant changes in the situation. If you are into blind optimism or any other coping mechanism, cheers and good luck. I am ready for big changes and until then it's a poofest. I have been a Panther's fan long enough to recognize the cycle and I am in it for the long haul. Enjoy the riot and dream of better days to come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Were we a better team after releasing Anderson? Did we pay MORE money to actually get worse? 

  No matter what his production was here, or now,  CJ was our backup plan if CMC gets injured. Whether he was playing a lot or not. We were 6-3. But we cut our best option and spend money to do it. His production today is irrelevant. There was no logical reason to make a team worse and pay for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Riiiight.

Here's the thing, dude. I don't "hate" guys for being lousy at their jobs.

Nor do I hate them for cutting my favorite player (something you could stand to do less of, by the way).

On the flipside, I also don't support guys keeping jobs they do poorly.

But the biggest difference between you and me is that I don't change my positions just to spite people.

I believe what I believe, regardless of whether someone else does or not. Whereas you're apparently so desperate to win an argument with me that you'll take up ridiculous ideas just to do so.

No offense dude, but you're not that important to me.

I talk football on this board because I enjoy doing so, not because I'm on a mission to change people's minds or be popular.  if that kind of thing mattered to me, I just go along with what everybody else says. I don't.

Now, when this is no longer fun, that's when I'll stop. And admittedly, cheering for a team that's going to continue to be mediocre takes a lot of the fun out of it, so that's a real possibility.

if I do, then I suppose you can declare yourself the winner of the argument and maybe you'll feel a sense of satisfaction.

Here's hoping, right?

  When site beer isn’t enough

 

BDE9CF19-7DB9-48EE-8E5A-9B226000F8DA.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Were we a better team after releasing Anderson? Did we pay MORE money to actually get worse? 

  No matter what his production was here, or now,  CJ was our backup plan if CMC gets injured. Whether he was playing a lot or not. We were 6-3. But we cut our best option and spend money to do it. His production today is irrelevant. There was no logical reason to make a team worse and pay for it. 

Why did we cut Steve Smith?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Scot’s logic:

A) Steve Smith gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = great move

B) CJ Anderson gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = terrible move warranting post after post complaining in this thread

Wonder what the difference was between the two...hmmm, could it be who our GM was at the time of each...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Riiiight.

Here's the thing, dude. I don't "hate" guys for being lousy at their jobs.

Nor do I hate them for cutting my favorite player (something you could stand to do less of, by the way).

On the flipside, I also don't support guys keeping jobs they do poorly.

But the biggest difference between you and me is that I don't change my positions just to spite people.

I believe what I believe, regardless of whether someone else does or not. Whereas you're apparently so desperate to win an argument with me that you'll take up ridiculous ideas just to do so.

No offense dude, but you're not that important to me.

I talk football on this board because I enjoy doing so, not because I'm on a mission to change people's minds or be popular.  if that kind of thing mattered to me, I just go along with what everybody else says. I don't.

Now, when this is no longer fun, that's when I'll stop. And admittedly, cheering for a team that's going to continue to be mediocre takes a lot of the fun out of it, so that's a real possibility.

if I do, then I suppose you can declare yourself the winner of the argument and maybe you'll feel a sense of satisfaction.

Here's hoping, right?

My goal with you is not to win an argument, it's to have interesting, if not sometimes fruitful, football discussion. Your littering of the board with the same old Hurney and Rivera potshots and using the same old tiresome, decidedly patronizing and negative attitude towards sound rationale, though you may disagree with it, is not conducive towards that goal. Your simplistic attitude pertaining to issues and your continued arguments like, he-cut-your-favorite-player-so-you-are-angry  is very telling in light of your refusal to acknowledge that not only do you not know the favorite player, nor the basis for the "anger."

It's also telling that you said that you thought that Rivera was a "good" coach (who you admittedly said you didn't believe could get us to a championship), and now you're emphasizing how "incompetent" he is and effectively dumping on everything small or large that he has ever done, positive or negative. It's just indicative of your feeding off the negativity and "egging on" the nonsensical when you pass yourself off as being a voice of reason.

As for my limited importance to you (which is the quite logical expectation) as it only encompasses the discussion confined to this board, it's not like you can't use the ignore button. I haven't because I (probably foolishly) hold out hope that you can actually be a nicer, more thoughtful forum member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

Mr. Scot’s logic:

A) Steve Smith gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = great move

B) CJ Anderson gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = terrible move warranting post after post complaining in this thread

Wonder what the difference was between the two...hmmm, could it be who our GM was at the time of each...?

His motive is very obvious.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Car123 said:

Why did we cut Steve Smith?

Money, production and out of Smiths mouth a couple months ago..”They did the right thing. It needed to be Cams team”. But people don’t want to hear Smitty say that. 

 And how does that answer the question? Just deflect to something else, about a GM who is gone forever. Let’s worry about the one running the team into the ground. Again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Mr. Scot’s logic:

A) Steve Smith gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = great move

B) CJ Anderson gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = terrible move warranting post after post complaining in this thread

Wonder what the difference was between the two...hmmm, could it be who our GM was at the time of each...?

When a high five emoji isn't enough..

AnchoredCircularDipper-size_restricted.gif.672d9ddcd1a4cf39283b1f73c8faafcf.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

My goal with you is not to win an argument, it's to have interesting, if not sometimes fruitful, football discussion. Your littering of the board with the same old Hurney and Rivera potshots and using the same old tiresome, decidedly patronizing and negative attitude towards sound rationale, though you may disagree with it, is not conducive towards that goal. Your simplistic attitude pertaining to issues and your continued arguments like, he-cut-your-favorite-player-so-you-are-angry  is very telling in light of your refusal to acknowledge that not only do you not know the favorite player, nor the basis for the "anger."

It's also telling that you said that you thought that Rivera was a "good" coach (who you admittedly said you didn't believe could get us to a championship), and now you're emphasizing how "incompetent" he is and effectively dumping on everything small or large that he has ever done, positive or negative. It's just indicative of your feeding off the negativity and "egging on" the nonsensical when you pass yourself off as being a voice of reason.

As for my limited importance to you (which is the quite logical expectation) as it only encompasses the discussion confined to this board, it's not like you can't use the ignore button. I haven't because I (probably foolishly) hold out hope that you can actually be a nicer, more thoughtful forum member.

827698800_giphy(1).gif.03aaac67dca55a9cb1cee2bcb6a2e5ab.gif

I'm so Happy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Mr. Scot’s logic:

A) Steve Smith gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = great move

B) CJ Anderson gets cut...goes on to have a great season with a new team = terrible move warranting post after post complaining in this thread

Wonder what the difference was between the two...hmmm, could it be who our GM was at the time of each...?

    Because there were no differences in those situations? This is sad. Even Smitty said he had to go for it he Cams team. 

  And once again, what does Smitty have to do with this move? 

  What’s the motivation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...