Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: reviewable penalty/non-penalty calls


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Terrible officiating. Wouldn't it make sense to add reviewable penalty/non-penalty calls to the game ? Maybe one or two reviews per side per game. Letting the game be decided by terrible and missed calls is unacceptable. Not talking just about just the NFC playoff game, but many games are lost to terrible calls/non-calls.....what you got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there should be a way to challenge penalties, but I'm not sure where we draw the line. Interference? Sure. Holding? They could call that almost every play.

I definitely think cameras on the first down markers for every game and there should be chips inside the footballs to determine where the ball is in the field of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't make them reviewable. It's part of the game to have human error reffing and it generally all evens out. Would only slow the game down more and frankly wouldn't solve anything, there'd still be a ton of controversial stuff on review...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

if you want reviewable penalties then why not just go all in and get the refs off the field and in a box with multiple camera angles to make calls in real time. the league certainly has the resources for it.

Box review every play, Imagine the potential commercial profits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

if you want reviewable penalties then why not just go all in and get the refs off the field and in a box with multiple camera angles to make calls in real time. the league certainly has the resources for it.

This is probably the first thing you have ever said that was not complete horseshit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jmac said:

Terrible officiating. Wouldn't it make sense to add reviewable penalty/non-penalty calls to the game ? Maybe one or two reviews per side per game. Letting the game be decided by terrible and missed calls is unacceptable. Not talking just about just the NFC playoff game, but many games are lost to terrible calls/non-calls.....what you got?

The game would last all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet if you review penalties on every play,.. there are penalties on every play,. A lot of no calls would be called, a lot of calls might come back.

it would make for a 5 hour game though so they won’t— it would be slower than baseball,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...