Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FBI Agent Peanut


Tepper's Chest Hair

Recommended Posts

beware there ye KRAFTY squirrels don't be messy & sleazy on the hunt for an easy nut for if you were to fumble to the wrong PLANTERS then indeed you might just sow & reap the ole hokie pokie instead where they lie & the birds don't fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChrisSimmsspleen said:

This is how you set an example of how to help improve society.  Perhaps Nike could start an ad campaign using a real hero.  

in this day and age of anti law enforcement?

I’m not in Marketing but Kap was the better fit for buisness for the younger crowd...which is basically Nike’s target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has the makings of buddy cop TV series. The former NFL star, a rookie in his second career, paired with a by the books veteran on the force, solving crimes and kicking butt.  The NFL star would be wearing nice suits and driving a sports car but have no clue as work the judicial system juxtaposed with the grizzled agent paying alimony and child support and not much left over for himself but can solve crimes in the allotted 40 mins each week.  

What do you guys thinks? @PhillyB, want to jump in on this with me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...