Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clemson Fans what are your thoughts?


yasuhara2241

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Shoulda went with 1981, they've been top 20 in attendance since then. 76k plus fans every home game in 2009. 

I mean there was a time when “Clemsoning” was a thing. Bowden never took them over the hill. I say this as Clemson was my #2 team growing up before VT joined the ACC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Clemson fans didnt exist until 2011, change my mind.

 

 

:Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

My neighbors were huge Clemson fans and were flying Clemson flags pre 81. I've known diehard Clemson fans my whole life.

Been putting up with it from friends since I moved to Charleston in 2001 and made a bunch of new friends.  

Not a fan myself but this is far from true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, yasuhara2241 said:

There are a ton of Clemson players in the draft but I would like to hear your thoughts on the following players. What are their strengths and weaknesses. What Round? 

Christian Wilkins

Clelin Ferrell

Dexter Lawrence

Trayvon Mullen

Austin Byrant 

Mark Fields

Christian Wilkins - 1st round. 

By far his biggest trait is his leadership and motor. Non-stop engine and will give his 100% every game. Excellent pass rushing ability for a DT. Love him.

 

Clelin Ferrell - 1st Round

Another great leader and person. A lot of people are a lot higher on him than me. Will be a solid player and contribute, but don’t imagine him being a top 10 player at his position in the NFL. He really benefited from players around him on the D-line. 

 

Dexter Lawrence - 1st Round

The most underrated prospect coming out of Clemson and this draft IMO. Dude is a monster in size and agility. CONSTANTLY double teamed and beating them on a regular bases. Clemson’s sack numbers are a lot in part because of this man. Honestly he’s my number 1 choice for our pick at 16. Would be a top 10 lock in almost any other year. 

 

Trayvon Mullen - Late 1st, Mid 2nd Round

The kid was lock down all 3 years at Clemson. Came in and started as a freshman and has kept the job every year. Hard to gauge him based on being behind the best D-line in the country. Has all the meausables you want in the NFL. Wouldn’t mind him in the 2nd. 

Mark Fields - 5th and beyond

Unbelievable talent. SUPER fast. His issue has been immaturity. Never fully bought into the culture and expectation Dabo has for his football players. Constantly suspended for being late, bad attitude, etc. Honestly, I wouldn’t want us to draft him at all. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

So let me get this straight. CF is the only player on the Clemson dline that benefited from talent around him? I have a hard time believing that. 

Absolutely not. They all did, but from a guy that watched every single Clemson game the whole time they’ve been here, I believe he has the least amount of NFL talent and benefited more than the other two studs than they benefited from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

Absolutely not. They all did, but from a guy that watched every single Clemson game the whole time they’ve been here, I believe he has the least amount of NFL talent and benefited more than the other two studs than they benefited from him. 

What does that mean, “nfl talent?” And can you actually break that down? I see a lot of people saying he benefited.... hows that? Did he see a significant drop in double teams as opposed to other DEs? Was the qb flushed out of the pocket from your DTs into CF every sack? Was the opposite DE facing the better OT? 

 

Im not saying there’s nothing to this assertion that CF benefited, but it’s like some sort of social media trend now that just caught on, like a wildfire. And the same isn’t said for the rest of Clemson’s DL which is really funny to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

What does that mean, “nfl talent?” And can you actually break that down? I see a lot of people saying he benefited.... hows that? Did he see a significant drop in double teams as opposed to other DEs? Was the qb flushed out of the pocket from your DTs into CF every sack? Was the opposite DE facing the better OT? 

 

Im not saying there’s nothing to this assertion that CF benefited, but it’s like some sort of social media trend now that just caught on, like a wildfire. And the same isn’t said for the rest of Clemson’s DL which is really funny to me. 

When I say NFL talent, I mean he was an absolute monster in college, but I don’t believe his collegiate numbers will translate to the NFL level. Will he be a solid starter? Absolutely. Will he be a Clowney, Watt, Miller, etc no, I don’t believe so.

As far as double teams, neither one of Clemson’s DE saw many double teams. Majority of double teams we’re put on our DTs, Lawrence and Wilkins, both in which we’re unbelievable. As far as being flushed out, YES, a ton. Our interior pressure was what other teams couldn’t adjust to. They’d have 3/4 lineman fighting off both Wilkins and Lawerance and the QB still got flushed out of the pocket. 

I cant speak to the social media trend, but I’ve felt this way before this year... CF is awesome, but he’s sliding down boards because he doesn’t have as high of a ceiling as Sweat, Gary, Bosa, etc. Don’t get me wrong, I bleed orange, but I wouldn’t be ecstatic if CF is the pick over a multitude of guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...