Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So...statistically is it better


sml1950

Recommended Posts

To have a great offense or defense.  If measured by the last 4 AFC/NFC championship games, it’s offense in a landslide.  Of these 16 teams only 3 were out of the top 5 scoring teams for that year and this year’s had the 1,2,3, and 4.  On defense, 10 of the sixteen were outside the top five with this year being 7,14,20, and 24.  http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=true&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=SCORING&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

The recent rule changes have created a perfect storm for offenses and teams that don’t get fully on board will wallow in mediocrity. As such, even with this being a defensive draft, if MK Metcalf is there at 16, run the card up.  At 6’3” 230, he’s slightly smaller but faster than Megatron and the same size but faster than J Jones and J Gordon.  That gives us 3 young WRs at 4.42 or better, along with Olsen, CMC, and Norv.  Add another OL and RB, then fill in on defense.  Get back to close to 30 points per game and let the chips fall where they may on defense.  Even with what’s on the team currently, the defense will finish higher than 20/24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sml1950 said:

To have a great offense or defense.  If measured by the last 4 AFC/NFC championship games, it’s offense in a landslide.  Of these 16 teams only 3 were out of the top 5 scoring teams for that year and this year’s had the 1,2,3, and 4.  On defense, 10 of the sixteen were outside the top five with this year being 7,14,20, and 24.  http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=true&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=SCORING&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

The recent rule changes have created a perfect storm for offenses and teams that don’t get fully on board will wallow in mediocrity. As such, even with this being a defensive draft, if MK Metcalf is there at 16, run the card up.  At 6’3” 230, he’s slightly smaller but faster than Megatron and the same size but faster than J Jones and J Gordon.  That gives us 3 young WRs at 4.42 or better, along with Olsen, CMC, and Norv.  Add another OL and RB, then fill in on defense.  Get back to close to 30 points per game and let the chips fall where they may on defense.  Even with what’s on the team currently, the defense will finish higher than 20/24.

So you made all these conclusions based on 8 games? 4 for each conference?  Pretty small n in order to make such big conclusions. How about the last 4 Superbowls? Did offense or defense win? Did the best offenses score under or over their yearly average in the championship games? There is a lot you can do with this. But to determine our future needs based on what little information you used makes little sense. Seems you shaped the facts to fit your already determined opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

So you made all these conclusions based on 8 games? 4 for each conference?  Pretty small n in order to make such big conclusions. How about the last 4 Superbowls? Did offense or defense win? Did the best offenses score under or over their yearly average in the championship games? There is a lot you can do with this. But to determine our future needs based on what little information you used makes little sense. Seems you shaped the facts to fit your already determined opinion.

^^ This pretty much sums it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sml1950 said:

To have a great offense or defense.  If measured by the last 4 AFC/NFC championship games, it’s offense in a landslide.  Of these 16 teams only 3 were out of the top 5 scoring teams for that year and this year’s had the 1,2,3, and 4.  On defense, 10 of the sixteen were outside the top five with this year being 7,14,20, and 24.  http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=true&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=SCORING&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2017&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

The recent rule changes have created a perfect storm for offenses and teams that don’t get fully on board will wallow in mediocrity. As such, even with this being a defensive draft, if MK Metcalf is there at 16, run the card up.  At 6’3” 230, he’s slightly smaller but faster than Megatron and the same size but faster than J Jones and J Gordon.  That gives us 3 young WRs at 4.42 or better, along with Olsen, CMC, and Norv.  Add another OL and RB, then fill in on defense.  Get back to close to 30 points per game and let the chips fall where they may on defense.  Even with what’s on the team currently, the defense will finish higher than 20/24.

Good Christ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Metcalf is BPA, you take him and concentrate on defense in the later rounds.

There is always more than one way to put the puzzle together. If it's the deepest draft on the D-line (in history, that I've seen proposed by some) in a while, then you can address those needs day two. But, no mistake about it, IF Metcalf is the BPA, you take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're saying the same thing as I said.  Until Jordan becomes an active part of recruiting and funding, this school will continue to fall way behind.  But to say Michael Jordan or the Jordan brand doesn't matter anymore, which is what you said, is flat out wrong.  
    • I have not learnt my lesson and will always want Uber athletic profiles. Sorry, Im a whore about it.... Im not the right guy to defend Kenyon, I just have a understanding with this years draft, numbers, and panthers roster. He is more of "upside/project" and we are talking 19th pick here too.  I know about the years of all the mock drafts with TEs in them and I did want Pitts too.... Look I love the current TEs on the roster too, just this guy should be better than any of them at their best.  Right now I feel OT is the correct target, but panthers as a org are trying to win in 2026 than 2027. So tea leaves and all, Kenyon would help this year. You can even say flex him to slot for most of the snaps and think of tmac on smoke routes with Kenyon blocking for him. I just hate BY is the shooter..... warren, I would say he's the better prospect even without his rookie year, *but he was late bloomer like XL if Im right, plus age was 25ish?? Bears picked love above him, mainly cause of recs.  You can make a case that Kenyon is not a TE, but a moving weapon for offense that can be in the backfield, on the LOS, slot, and even X.... imean he's got XLs combine on some numbers.... He would be better to a offense mad scientist type...is that Dave? or is that bevell?? I think the Panthers should have him as a 19 pick, with others... 
    • That's one of the best power play games I've seen us have in a while.
×
×
  • Create New...