Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cards shopping Rosen for a 3...


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, archer4364 said:

If you think Grier is a better prospect than Rosen you were dropped on your head as a kid, no other possibility. Whew whew cbs dot com draft canceled whew whew. Rosen was drafted what, tenth? Let's see where Grier falls. 

 

Whew whew Tom Brady was drafted in the sixth round whew whew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

I'm glad you think his "college tape" is better because his stats sure as hell weren't.

Rosen: 60.9% completions, 8 YPA, 59 TD, 26 INT, 140.1 rating

Grier: 65.7% completions, 9 YPA, 81 TD, 23 INT, 165.2 rating

Rosen's arm is weaker, his accuracy is worse, his decision-making is worse and he's already got the sting of an awful rookie season. If he was so good, his own team wouldn't be trying to dump him.

UCLA wasted Rosen. His supporting cast was garbage.  Seriously, UCLA's receivers are horrific. As soon as he got someone halfway decent in Jordan Lasley, he threw his way often and for 1264yds 9TD's. You can't compare WVU and UCLA's offenses, thats just not fair lol.  I don't even like Rosen, he's a prick, but I did watch almost every college game of his.  Not sure where this story of being inaccurate is coming from.  He has zero time to throw and zero capable receivers pretty much his entire time there. The amount of dropped balls UCLA had was astounding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

You guys really gotta stop with the "tape" stuff. Nobody here as seen a damn second of All-22 or anything related to these guys. I get what you're saying, but it's inherently wrong and has been proven already. Rosen is a slightly better Jimmy Clausen. 

Weird flex but ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The chatter that comes with it may be something the team wants to avoid, though.

I also have to admit I'm a little disturbed at the prospect of a team wanting to give up one year in on a guy they drafted in the high first. New coach yes, but the same GM that drafted him is still in place, and it's not like the Cardinals don't have other needs.

This could be one of those scenarios where "wow, why are they trading him" turns into "oh, now I understand".

How would that be different than drafting Grier in the second or third round? You think using a high draft pick on a QB wouldn’t cause any chatter or a potential QB controversy? Especially considering, in this scenario, that we’d potentially be using a higher draft pick on Grier (i.e. a greater investment) than we would be to trade for Rosen. With a greater investment, comes greater expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

How would that be different than drafting Grier in the second or third round? You think using a high draft pick on a QB wouldn’t cause any chatter or a potential QB controversy? Especially considering, in this scenario, that we’d potentially be using a higher draft pick on Grier (i.e. a greater investment) than we would be to trade for Rosen. With a greater investment, comes greater expectations.

I said exactly this to him. He has been driving the Grier hype train extras hard here lately, which is shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, archer4364 said:

If you think Grier is a better prospect than Rosen you were dropped on your head as a kid, no other possibility. Whew whew cbs dot com draft canceled whew whew. Rosen was drafted what, tenth? Let's see where Grier falls. 

 

l don't really have a dog in the fight. I just know that a great QB can come in any round, even no round. I would think that an HC (and QB guru) such as Norv Turner not only knows way more than I do about the subject,and, perhaps more importantly, knows his own thoughts and plans better than I do.

History has taught us time and time again that bad to great QBs come from all rounds, so I'm certainly not going to assume anything until I see something (or nothing) on the professional level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosen might be ok and it's definitely premature to say he's a bust, but why do people conversely assume that he's going to be good? He was the qb for the worst offense in the league. There were 5 qbs taken in the first round last year; Rosen looked like the worst and I honestly don't think it was that close. Paxton Lynch and Johnny Manziel were also recent first round picks. 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I don't think a 3rd round pick isn't worth the price to gamble that he'll become something. But the majority here seem to think this guy deserves a first round pick, with a third being laughable and probably fake news. I don't get it. 

For the record, I'd rather the Panthers stay away cause I suspect he'll be more distraction than actually help our team, and think we should be trying to accumulate picks in this deep draft, not trade them away. But I could see the potential appeal in a 3rd for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

Rosen might be ok and it's definitely premature to say he's a bust, but why do people conversely assume that he's going to be good? He was the qb for the worst offense in the league. There were 5 qbs taken in the first round last year; Rosen looked like the worst and I honestly don't think it was that close. Paxton Lynch and Johnny Manziel were also recent first round picks. 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I don't think a 3rd round pick isn't worth the price to gamble that he'll become something. But the majority here seem to think this guy deserves a first round pick, with a third being laughable and probably fake news. I don't get it. 

For the record, I'd rather the Panthers stay away cause I suspect he'll be more distraction than actually help our team, and think we should be trying to accumulate picks in this deep draft, not trade them away. But I could see the potential appeal in a 3rd for him.

Young QBs normally get a mulligan on a busted first year, And that cards team was awful in general. Remember when their running back was hands down the best rb in the league? Not in that offense. It’s hard to say all of that was Rosen’s fault, the Qb before got in looked bad as well. However, he did go into Green Bay and got Mike fired in Lambo. So if you giving him a Mulligan on that you go back to the college tape.

College tape Got him drafted first round in a much better qb class, if you split the difference he’s atleast if second round value and your getting him for a 3rd rounder pick who is cheaper than a second round pick by contract Value. Guy still has plenty of upside and if he looks good preseason or mop up duty you flip him for a first round pick maybe even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

l don't really have a dog in the fight. I just know that a great QB can come in any round, even no round. I would think that an HC (and QB guru) such as Norv Turner not only knows way more than I do about the subject,and, perhaps more importantly, knows his own thoughts and plans better than I do.

History has taught us time and time again that bad to great QBs come from all rounds, so I'm certainly not going to assume anything until I see something (or nothing) on the professional level.

If we don't win Norv might not be here anyway..  So depending on him to develop a project QB is a iffy situation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't judge Rosen by last year.  That Cardinals team was set up to fail.. They fired Wilks after 1 season without giving him anything to work with. Rosen had no Oline 1 good vet WR and a rookie. AND David Johnson wasn't at his best.  Him and Allen were in the worst offensive situation as rookies..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm more impressed with the UDFA that the guys they have drafted in the first the last 2 years. A whole lot of prove it is still needed before any improvement should be talked about seriously.
    • Sure.    ignore that he said this roster wasn’t good in 2023 to 2024 but keep up the effort
    • While I don't believe its a must win, (we have been better on the road this post season) it is definitely A NEED TO WIN the longer this series goes the more pronounced the Canes advantage on rest and health will be! If we hold serve at home in games 1 and 2 guaranteeing a 6 game minimum series for them if we lose the road games..... by the game 4 and 5 I expect them to be beat they have played A LOT OF HOCKEY the last three years, they have MINIMAL rest off a more physical than one might have expected series vs the leafs.... you know Tampa took their pound of flesh in round 1 from them. Combine all that with the fact that even though this year's canes squad isn't as talented as last years this IS a better squad than the one they swept last time that had McKenzie Mckeathern on line 1 Turbo with a broken hand a banged uo and eventually concussed Slavin (and even though it was a sweep 6 OTS and 4 1 goal losses is hardly dominant)  This year Bob hasn't been superman (hes probably gonna still have a great save percentage agiast us just a side effect of our style) Thatchuk is maybe 50% (3 game winners agiast us) their defense no longer has Gudas and several other downgrades.  While the Canes have a healthy and performing Svechnikov along with other big guys to counteract florida like Carrier, Jankowski, Robinson.   I by know means think it will happen but I either see this as a low scoring dog fight or a series were the canes surprise and end up dominating.
×
×
  • Create New...