Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*if McCoy were to sign*


Panthero

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mistuh Jones said:

Love will sub one of those. Don't forget we won't be exclusively 3-4. In nickel there will be 4 linemen. 2 of the ends in this alignment will be burns/addison/irvin/haynes 

True, true. Im maybe too ocd on depth charts. Can only have so many d lineman on the 53. I guess the Cox could be a potential answer there as well if someone goes down.  Just seems like if one were to get hurt it would limit our ability to use that front as much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Yeah, i see that but i watched a video that Cower did and it seemed like you need run stuffers there.

 

 

You don't think our guys can stuff the run?

Athleticism, communication and understanding the concepts are the main things.

I do understand your concerns, but my current and main concern regarding the 3-4 (from listening to the vid would be the safety positions, and probably the FS position the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

You don't think our guys can stuff the run?

Athleticism, communication and understanding the concepts are the main things.

I do understand your concerns, but my current and main concern regarding the 3-4 (from listening to the vid would be the safety positions, and probably the FS position the most.

Yeah, i guess im so used to watching bama, that i have a fixed vision in my head of what a DE in a 3-4 looks like. Agree the safety needs more attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Panthero said:

If we do somehow get him that still leaves us with depth issues at the 3 in the 3-4.

NT- poe and butler

DE- kk

DE- mccoy

Who are the backups for the two de positions in that front? Is kyle love a DE in that front? Serious question, not trying to be a wet blanket.

I have absolutely no issue with the thread title. As a matter of fact, I love it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

I have absolutely no issue with the thread title. As a matter of fact, I love it. 

Thanks. i really wasnt trying to stir the poo. I just fret over depth, maybe far more than i should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

lmao changing the title 500x isnt going to take those poop emogies off your face brah

Thats ok. Just so long as people dont think i was intentionally trolling them, ill take the lumps. Learn to think my thread titles more carefully in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Panthero said:

If we do somehow get him that still leaves us with depth issues at the 3 in the 3-4.

NT- poe and butler

DE- kk

DE- mccoy

Who are the backups for the two de positions in that front? Is kyle love a DE in that front? Serious question, not trying to be a wet blanket.

So I’m confused.  How does adding a starter as a 3-4 DE still leave us short?   Love is one rotational DE.  Butler could do it on occasion.  But from a depth piece look for Destiny Vaeao or Qualls.  That is what today’s NFL is.  Your not gonna have starters 7 people deep.  

But calling the possible best line in the nfl concerning?  Having those starters with Love and Butler rotating in is nothing to be concerned about.  Look at other teams.  Your head would fall off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Black&BlueBubba said:

So I’m confused.  How does adding a starter as a 3-4 DE still leave us short?   Love is one rotational DE.  Butler could do it on occasion.  But from a depth piece look for Destiny Vaeao or Qualls.  That is what today’s NFL is.  Your not gonna have starters 7 people deep.  

But calling the possible best line in the nfl concerning.  Having those starters with Love and Butler rotating in is nothing to be concerned about.  Look at other teams.  Your head would fall off. 

Thats a good retort. Maybe im being paranoid. My thought was just that our starters would kick ass, but one injury could derail us. Guess thats true for most teams though. Seems like there would be a hell of a steep drop off though, which would limit us in using that front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...