Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Film breakdown of Rashaan Gaulden


Recommended Posts

Good breakdown. Sort of alludes to the obvious weaknesses but does highlight his potential and some of the skills that he did show last year. 

I am definitely skeptical of Gaulden being the guy and just having a project player starting as a whole. But, it is what it is right now. He's going to be the guy for us next season, so hopefully he can make a lot of progress this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Good breakdown. Sort of alludes to the obvious weaknesses but does highlight his potential and some of the skills that he did show last year. 

I am definitely skeptical of Gaulden being the guy and just having a project player starting as a whole. But, it is what it is right now. He's going to be the guy for us next season, so hopefully he can make a lot of progress this offseason.

If he can wrap his head around the position, I think there could be good potential. I would love for him to take those steps, because can you imagine the hammers that would be dropped between Reid and him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

If he can wrap his head around the position, I think there could be good potential. I would love for him to take those steps, because can you imagine the hammers that would be dropped between Reid and him?

I just hope the light comes on sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure our faith to address the safety position points to the coaching staff having confidence in Gaulden. It's the norm for us not to address the position and try to make do with scraps.

The biggest difference is the move from proven vets who know exactly what we want to a young project player. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems Gaulden has a LB or SS mentality, as long as things are in front of him and he's able to play downhill, he's fine.  However when he's has to drop in coverage, he seems timid.  That's one thing you can't have is a FS that is unsure of his coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The biggest difference is the move from proven vets who know exactly what we want to a young project player. It will be interesting to see what happens.

We'll see. I'm not at all convinced that our starting FS won't eventually end up being some vet on his last legs that doesn't make the final roster elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

 Nice breakdown thanks for the post

I really like the stuff this kid puts out.  Not just someone sitting behind the desk talking. He does great film breakdowns.   And seems to know what he is talking about.  

I have listened to their podcast a couple times.  It’s OK. But the film stuff this kid does is top notch. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It seems Gaulden has a LB or SS mentality, as long as things are in front of him and he's able to play downhill, he's fine.  However when he's has to drop in coverage, he seems timid.  That's one thing you can't have is a FS that is unsure of his coverage skills.

I think that has more to do with his lack of experience than actual timidness.  He's still figuring things out and learning the new position.  He's still thinking rather than just reading and reacting to what he sees.  That was always my issue with the naysayers in regards to Gaulden.  Anyone that was paying attention knew that there would be a learning curve, and that year one was going to basically be a redshirt, adjustment year. 

Unfortunately, many didn't/don't have the patience to let a player develop.  They expect them to be ready to play right out of the box, but that's not how it works for the majority of players.  I think people also tend to see one mistake and generalize that to exemplify their overall talent and skillset...especially when it's a player that hasn't seen much field time).

  I don't know if he's going to be the answer or not (we haven't seen enough to get a realistic idea), but I do think he has the potential to be a solid safety once he gets comfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We'll see. I'm not at all convinced that our starting FS won't eventually end up being some vet on his last legs that doesn't make the final roster elsewhere.

Unless he is just a disaster at camp, then I wouldn't expect to see that move until early to mid-season. That would be pretty typical of us too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't see it as drafting a premium player to sit and wait if Walker gets hurt. We need a legitimate swing T. Unless you have a Sewell or Slater type tackle that is pretty much a sure thing, these guys can need some time to develop year 1 just like a QB ideally should. They all haven't played the elite 5 star talent on the edge. If we think another franchise tackle has dropped to us at 19, you have to pull the trigger. The position is just too damn hard to find. If it's just a "we need a tackle and this guy has a T on the board", yeah, move on, take one in the later rounds. But if that guy is there, let him back up and learn a year, then slide him into LT on year 2 of his rookie deal.  I don't see us being able to offer Walker a multi year contract after a prove it year, pay Moton his final almost fully guaranteed year, Hunt, Lewis a center and do a 50-60m extension for Bryce. The 3 most important positions on the field are QB, blindside tackle (usually LT), and edge rusher. Those are the premium positions that cost the most and are hardest to come by. If a starting caliber talent is there at 19 you have to pull the trigger.  I understand the need for a DT and S. I've been on the C and FS train for years. If we weren't staring at a potential Bryce extension, it'd make the decision a lot easier I think. It's just with all these huge contracts I don't see how we can hedge our bets on being able or even wanting to re-sign Walker, especially if he has a bad year. Icky and BC's injuries really hurt our long term plans.  If no blue chip talent at those 3 key positions are available at 19, by all means pass and draft another position. But I think it's pretty safe to say we don't have a guaranteed lock at any of them right now beyond Phillips, and they have to be somewhat of a priority. 
    • Not completely accurate. I'm sure Roy is lobbying for him and Larry Brown has spoke put in support too. But Hansbrough has made comments pretty critical and hinting at a need for change. Joel Berry has gone a step further and said the standard has not been met. Scott Williams who was a teammate of Hubert's at Carolina has gone all the way and said it's time for a change at head coach.
    • 4.25 according to the ACC network broadcast. If only this guy was a couple years younger but he’s still a dawg. 
×
×
  • Create New...