Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF say their highest rated Panther yesterday..


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

Just now, Harbingers said:

Ya he secured it and was going for extra yardage. My point is going into that scrum he didn’t get his upper body and head low enough not to leave that huge hole for the peanut punch. But you can damn sure well expect him to be working anti-punch drills for the next few weeks. 

No doubt he could of done better w/ his technique.  He is young.  A learning experience.  

I just think it is one of those plays where it was really just more of a great defensive play than anything.   They happen.  I mean sometimes a DB has legit perfect coverage on a play....and a QB puts a ball somewhere special and the WR does something special.  Stuff happens.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

No doubt he could of done better w/ his technique.  He is young.  A learning experience.  

I just think it is one of those plays where it was really just more of a great defensive play than anything. 

"The other guys get paid to make plays too"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Also, Shaq (like Thomas Davis) apparently has figured it after a relatively slow start to his career bc he looked like the perfect modern day LB he was drafted to be yesterday. I remember lots of folks were down on TD and considered him average til we changed our Defense and started using him like Derrick Brooks a couple years into his career. 

Sometimes you need a contract year to get a few first round talents to play up to their potential. That's life. 

Yeah that's a piece of lore from TD's career that people tend to forget.  I remember people on this site saying that he sucked and was a bust for several years- hard hitter but a liability in pass defense.  He started to show flashes of what he would become in 08 and was having an All Pro type year in 09, but then the ACL saga started.  The TD as we know him emerged in 2012, which was year 8 of his career.

But yeah long story short Shaq looks like a different player at ILB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Yeah that's a piece of lore from TD's career that people tend to forget.  I remember people on this site saying that he sucked and was a bust for several years- hard hitter but a liability in pass defense.  He started to show flashes of what he would become in 08 and was having an All Pro type year in 09, but then the ACL saga started.  The TD as we know him emerged in 2012, which was year 8 of his career.

But yeah long story short Shaq looks like a different player at ILB.

Not signing him before the season may look worse as the season progresses.  He has looked solid at times over the past 2 years, but he looked like a Pro-Bowler yesterday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, archer4364 said:

How is CMC so low lol. That's how you know PFF is some garbage. Bradberry was good but... C'mon man.

The only other non-QB offensive player who has ever had that kind of impact in a game that CMC did yesterday (for the Panthers) was Steve Smith.

On a field with a lot of offensive stars threats on both sides, CMC was the best overall player out there, and the best RB and WR for either team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Not signing him before the season may look worse as the season progresses.  He has looked solid at times over the past 2 years, but he looked like a Pro-Bowler yesterday

Should have, at the very least, tried to get Bradberry under contract, and if that wouldn't go, Shaq.

We did neither.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, archer4364 said:

How is CMC so low lol. That's how you know PFF is some garbage. Bradberry was good but... C'mon man.

Its the plays where he wasn't the one with the ball that brought him down. They rate every player on every single play regardless of it they are the target or not. I guess he wasn't an all world blocker or didn't go hard when the plays weren't designed for him. All I know if when my RB has the ball he is a monster so  don't care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Should have, at the very least, tried to get Bradberry under contract, and if that wouldn't go, Shaq.

We did neither.

Yeah but not making a guy like Bradberry a priority isn't a bad move considering his great play is more "let's wait and see before we pay em" than Shaq 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I'm happy they're playing well but that's the NFL, you might lose a guy who balls in contract year, esp when they don't look like sure things til that year, even

Worst case scenario you have Shaq's replacement on the team already (Carter) and you picked a good year to draft CBs

That's life in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

probably play less snaps.  I mean, it was the plays he didn't touch the ball that brought him down. 

He made a impact on those too, you know creating a diversion that allows others to work. Again PFF should be looked at as a good forum poster. CMC was the best dam player on the field, fug that rating. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

He made a impact on those too, you know creating a diversion that allows others to work. Again PFF should be looked at as a good forum poster. CMC was the best dam player on the field, fug that rating. 

This is completely irrational, but i appreciate your support for hometown players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...