Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

-2 and 0


CRA

Recommended Posts

If Cam isn’t a dual threat QB he is a below average QB.   They wouldn’t even run Cam freaking Newton to get a half yard with the game on the line.  A gadget is the better option? If that is true Allen gives us a better chance 

The way the D played and the WRs got open....we easily handle Tampa  with an average QB tonight 

Sincerely, 

 

one of Cam’s biggest supporters (and that started pre-draft when most didn’t even like the idea)

if he is hurt.  Sit him. Simple as that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dex said:

Good on you for having the balls to say it. I thought the play calling was fun until that 4th and 1. Outside of a 3 or 4 plays of Daryl Williams getting taken to church Cam looked god awful. 

I wouldn’t of said that a couple years ago though.  A non dual threat Cam a couple years ago would have been somewhere around average. We could win with him.   

But whatever the cause....he has declined as a passer.  And if he isn’t a dual threat now? He is below average.   

Playcalling was fine today.   We had a billion chances.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is one of my favorite players of all time. This game hurt so bad.

I'm not ready for Cam to be done but that was as bad as he has ever played. 

I am, however, a glutton for punishment and will spend the nextb10 days telling myself that the next game he will have rested and look better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a complete and utter failure from start to finish. Coaching, play calling, execution. Everyone had a hand in this embarrassment. 

I would like to see Cam run, if able, because he’s much more effective when he does. However, there were a few times it looked like he had a lane to run and didn’t do it. I’m not sure if the problem is mental or physical, but something definitely isn’t right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

Agreed.  If Cam can't Cam, then he isn't Cam.  Why would you play a Cam that's not Cam?

Ya dig?

That has always been my motto.  Anytime someone in the past has said Cam should run less I disagreed.   Cam being Cam is what made him great.  Doesn’t work any other way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Even at this exact moment that's fuggin retarded.

Shula: 51-28 (post season 4 out of 5)

Norv: 7-11

we had our greatest franchise success with Shula.  Obviously he does get all the credit but the record is what it is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Shula: 51-28 (post season 4 out of 5)

Norv: 7-11

we had our greatest franchise success with Shula.  Obviously he does get all the credit but the record is what it is 

Stats are for nerds.  Shula couldn't win at Bama and Norv has big big diamonds and they didn't come from his daddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...