Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

... and/or speculation (which there will probably be more of than actual news).

Word that the 49ers are getting trade offers for backup quarterback CJ Beathard, offers described as being "in the sixth round range".

Reminder: The official deadline is 4pm tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been saying a trade needs to be made, a reliable returner for us is worth a 5th at this rate. 
 

if our wrs are truly struggling to get open aj green is a must as far as inquiry.

whatever is needed to fix the run defense is also worth a Inquiry.

and of course any o linemen worth a damn should be number 1 on our hit list.

without looking at cap implications, turner should also be on the block, if feasible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm Tepper, I'm not allowing any trades that either involve taking on new money or sacrificing draft picks. I hope he's now seen enough to reserve that for the next GM/Head Coach.

I would consider allowing trades that rid the Panthers of some high-priced contracts, if possible (ie. Trai Turner, Shaq Thompson, Mario Addison, maybe even Paradis).

What is clear is this is not a playoff caliber team, most of which is the fault of the coaching staff. Time to regroup and reload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those hoping for AJ Green

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-trade-deadline-bengals-redskins-frustrating-other-teams-with-stubborn-no-sell-stance/


"They are basically philosophically opposed to the idea of making trades," said one NFC GM. "It's a waste of time to call them. But we did. And it is what it is. You may as well be speaking a different language."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

For those hoping for AJ Green

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-trade-deadline-bengals-redskins-frustrating-other-teams-with-stubborn-no-sell-stance/


"They are basically philosophically opposed to the idea of making trades," said one NFC GM. "It's a waste of time to call them. But we did. And it is what it is. You may as well be speaking a different language."

Yeah I heard gm’s saying this for the bengals and skins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah I heard gm’s saying this for the bengals and skins 

The Bengals view AJ like the Cardinals do Fitz, it'll take a king's ransom the likes we've never seen to get AJ Green out of Cincy. But that was basically implied when Dre Kirkpatrick said the team would riot if Green was traded.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...