Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Save the panic until after Tenn, that game will tell us everything.


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

I know I know, it seems every Sunday we hear the same thing, “OMG this is the most important and pivotal game ever! A must win.” But heat me out on this one..

I really do think if we lose to a very beatable Titans team at home, drop 4-4, our season is done and it could really have a huge domino effect on this team’s trajectory for the foreseeable future. 

First it will spell the end of the Hurney/Rivera era,  you even have to wonder if they will even bother playing Cam at all at that point this season if we can’t win this game. 
 

However IF we win (spoiler alert, I actually think we win handily) it will mean this team has pulled it together and bounced back after a brutal loss to San Fran and they haven’t folded and we might be able to put another winning streak together. 
 

TLDR- it would be wise to put the panic on hold until after the Titans game. If we win then it might show you can chalk up the San Fran game to a usual post bye hangover after A LOT of traveling. However if we lose then  the season is done along with this current regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My own humble opinion is that because of the magnitude of this past loss, the importance of the Tennessee game gets magnified enormously. 

If they come out strong and post a solid win, that makes the San Francisco debacle look like an aberration.  Another loss congers up thoughts of last year, when after the wipeout in Pittsburgh we couldn't buy a win, even against teams where a mildly bad performance should have been enough.  A stinker and it looks like the wheels have come off, again.  These questions would not exist if we had dropped a 20-17 game.

Let's face it: Getting annihilated after having an extra week to prepare, even against a 6-0 team (now 7-0) creates a lot of questions, and doubt.  Especially going into Green Bay next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many people remember Game Five of the 2003 season, but it was against the same team we face this weekend.

We got our asses handed to us in that game. Lost by 20 points, and looked like sh-t doing it.

Our defense was exposed, our new quarterback (Delhomme) was terrible, we were a pretender, blah blah blah blah blah.

Went to the Super Bowl that season. Titans got eliminated in the divisional round.

You just never know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know how many people remember Game Five of the 2003 season.

We got our asses handed to us by the Tennessee Titans in that game. Lost by 20 points, and looked like sh-t doing it.

Our defense was exposed, our new quarterback (Delhomme) was terrible, we were a pretender, blah blah blah blah blah.

Went to the Super Bowl that season. Titans got eliminated in the divisional round.

You just never know...

Yes, but it was a completely different scenario with the top teams they had to overcome.   Also they didn't have Ron Rivera at the helm to right the ship.  This team doesn't have the grit that team had either to rebound from this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wish people would stop rolling with the whole "this weekend's game will tell us everything" bit.

It's hardly ever true.

I dunno man I learned all I needed to know watching the team get raped against the 49ers. Same old same old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

I dunno man I learned all I needed to know watching the team get raped against the 49ers. Same old same old.

I wouldn't deny that we looked like sh-t in that game.

I would point out that I have seen plenty of teams bounce back from a game where they looked like sh-t and go on to great seasons.

Can we do that? Ask me again in about eight weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't deny that we looked like sh-t in that game.

I would point out that I have seen plenty of teams bounce back from a game where they looked like sh-t and go on to great seasons.

Can we do that? Ask me again in about eight weeks.

There's a big difference between a simple bad game, like what you referenced with the Panthers in 2003, and getting completely and utterly shredded from top to bottom, with nothing positive. (except for Christian McCaffrey, the only legitimate player on the roster anymore)

Ron thought the Steelers game last season was just a bad game. Sh*t happens he said. It's a pattern. There's deep rooted problems with this squad that haven't gone away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...