Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid and Tre Boston are soft


Growl

Recommended Posts

Just now, Growl said:

lol nobody here cares about your fanatic proxy race war

 

get a hobby and stop following me around you nutter

Get a hobby says the guy who only shows up to the huddle to flail when Eric Reid makes a bad play.

Now that's funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, we must have the worst pair of tackling safeties in the league. I think I saw Reid wiff on 4 open field tackles today. He has at least 2 per game. And Boston is like a screaming missile who is either going to take your head off or fly right by you. 

To both their defense today, everybody was slipping and sliding during the 2nd half so they get a bit of a pass there. 

They both obviously have the ability to play well. They are just jackal and Hyde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much the whole secondary plays like a bunch of vegetarians ha.

they don’t tackle at all.

there was play after play where even when contact is made they get drug,.. like a daddy dragging his screaming kids. 
 

please daddy don’t go, please please please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheRed said:

OP doesn't care about winning. He only shows up to huff and puff when a player he doesn't like underperforms. We aren't winning with defense anymore and people need to accept those days are gone for the time being. We are losing because we are getting dumped on and we can't respond back. We are not without talent on either side of the ball. This is truthfully a bottom ranked offense without CMC having a career year. Again. We need an infusion of coaching ingenuity, or at least someone that actually understands what adjustments are and how they work.

That's all I can offer for you, if you want to keep going to bat for shitposters like Growl who just don't like Reid, go for it.

Wtf are you even talking about? Lol going to bat for him how? You are the one taking offense over something that isn’t there dude. 

 

Reid and Boston couldn’t tackle today. Allen sucked and our run Def sucked. You are the one getting triggered over Reid for no reason. He was really bad. I don’t know what else to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

James Bradberry is probably about the only guy we've got in the secondary who's a decent tackler right now.

Reid and Boston are bad, but if I was going to call out the worst of the bunch, I probably would have mentioned Donte Jackson over Boston.

You always hating on dj why you expect a corner to hit like a linebacker . A small corner at that lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...