Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently the math says going for two was right


TN05

Recommended Posts

I’ll never be convicted. River could not score in 3 minutes or less if his life depended on it. He needs a half of a quarter on a good day. Now if we were the chiefs patriots saints or rams? Yea I could see it. This is a team built for the 90s. You don’t take a coach like Rivera and put him in a catch up situation vs. tie it situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Duke could probably beat the Hornets. Enough haterade!
    • I brought it up elsewhere, but even the year we took SGA, which was the player I wanted that year (fwiw, I hated the Bridges pick), we took SGA then traded him for Bridges, who was taken a pick after ours.  Like why tf should anyone do that?  If we wanted Bridges, we could’ve just taken him without pick.  And all we netted was a 2nd round pick and a solid role player who beats women in his spare time.  But outside of player for player, all we gained was a 2nd rounder.  And don’t feel like going back to look, but look how many picks we traded over the years for nothing or cash considerations.  Remember when we drafted Duren and then traded him for literally fuging nothing?  These trades are too many to count.
    • Just stop drafting so many Duke players, this poo is getting old. 
×
×
  • Create New...