Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Raiders moving on from Carr


Raleigh PF

Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/raiders-to-consider-moving-on-from-derek-carr-and-targeting-a-quarterback-with-more-upside-in-2020/

James La Canfora]

Gruden and Carr have a solid relationship, the sources said, but there are concerns about not extending plays with the legs when possible, and Oakland has also struggled to push the ball downfield. Carr has been quite accurate -- completing 70 percent of his passes -- but the bulk of the work goes to tight ends and running backs, and he isn't by nature a gunslinger or a big-time playmaker; those characteristics resonate heavily with Gruden.

Seems like a natural fit for a Newton/Carr swap IF the Panthers and Cam are unable to reach an agreement (for the record, I hope they do). Gruden likes his vets and Cam seems to check all the boxes. 

For the Panthers, they get an accurate QB with a reasonable salary for the next several years.

So, IF a trade is in the offing (I said IF, everyone), what would be the package? My suggestion would be Cam and the Panthers 3rd round pick for Carr and their 17th overall, provided Cam signs an extension with the Raiders.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the Raiders giving up on him if he's a franchise QB worth building around? He'll be 29 next year with a 21.5 million dollar cap hit.

Don't see the argument for this possible move if you are against keeping Cam for one more year at 19 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Why are the Raiders giving up on him if he's a franchise QB worth building around? He'll be 29 next year with a 21.5 million dollar cap hit.

Don't see the argument for this possible move if you are against keeping Cam for one more year at 19 million.

Read the article. Explains it quite clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have a healthy Cam Newton, but I don't know details of his health

If he's unable to go, I think Carr would be the best quarterback we could realistically get for years

The Raiders are a mess of a franchise and got rid of Amari Cooper and Mack.

Kevin Stefanski could turn Carr into Kirk Cousins, which is enough to win a Super Bowl.  For as much as people complain bout Kirk Cousin's contract, he's the best quarterback who has come available in the market in years (and we're not picking high enough in the draft to get Burrow or Tua).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Read the article. Explains it quite clearly.

His head coach doesn't see enough "high end upside" for the price tag sounds to be about the gist of it. So basically buyers remorse. Seems to be a lot of that these days with the drama of the neverending quarterback carousel in the NFL. Maybe there is something the Panthers could learn from watching this unfold?

Are you in favor of kicking the tires on Carr? I'd rather look to the draft than hitch our wagon to a 100 million dollar quarterback whose team has already given up on him before he's reached 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...