Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have met with McCarthy twice


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, bobowilson said:

FLASHBACK:   AARON RODGERS BELIEVED MIKE MCCARTHY HAD “LOWEST IQ” OF ANY COACH HE EVER HAD

 

 

Who was the source?

and how smart is Aaron? 
 

note— usually the people that call other people dumb usually are covering up their own stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

The "low IQ" part would be a pretty huge concern if it's true.

A big part of why we lost so much with Rivera is because for a good portion of the time, he was coaching against people smarter than him.

Aaron Rodgers believes everyone has a low IQ. He seems like a know it all asshole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, The Huddler said:

for the record, Im all for hiring McCarthy


He had a lot of success in GB, and i think he had a hand in the "greatness" of Rodgers more than people think   I think he has a really good offensive system

 

 

plus, hes had a year to reflect on how to improve as a coach   

 

First reaction was naaaaahhh

 

but intuitively I really think we could be very successful under McCarthy

 

 

I don’t know what their fans complained about. They made it to the playoffs most years.

their problem closing out seasons for at least another Super Bowl was Aaron Rodgers ability to be Peyton Manning’s cousin and choke in Playoff games and never having a playoff defense when it mattered.

their super bowl season had a pretty good defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s simple. Win and everyone in here will say the culture is good. Dear lord the amount of time spent on these posts is hysterical. We’ve seen the end of season swoons where you can tell the team had given up with many of the same leaders that took us to playoff seasons. When your OL is decimated by injuries, it’s amazing how fast culture turns. When you get on a tear like 2015, everyone’s having fun. You need the right people regardless, but they have to win.
    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
×
×
  • Create New...