Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers targeting Ryan Tannehill in free agency

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted

Per Mike Freeman of Bleacherreport 

The always excellent Ian Rapoport from NFL Network reported that—for now—the Panthers are planning to move forward with Cam Newton.

That may end up being the case, but teams I speak to don't buy it. They believe the Panthers are going to pursue a QB in free agency, and the name I keep hearing is Ryan Tannehill.

The Panthers, goes the thinking around the league, are playing a nice game of poker and aren't close to settling on Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jesse Rising Star

Jesse

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Gross he is terrible 

Tannehill looked good this year. That's what a competent coaching staff can do--they can evaluate the entire program for their strengths and build upon that. This year they were a wide zone/play action off of it team and Tannehill feasted tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jared Patterson Mentor

Jared Patterson

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jesse said:

Tannehill looked good this year. That's what a competent coaching staff can do--they can evaluate the entire program for their strengths and build upon that. This year they were a wide zone/play action off of it team and Tannehill feasted tbh.

I saw him hand it off every time and look terrible when he had to get in shotgun and pass. Only looked good off play action dump offs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Panthers activate G Chandler Zavala from IR

      By Waldo · Posted

      Zavala was really bad his first year but I think he can still flash that unfortunately. Coaching? IDK. Inconvenience seems to be common.  Moton should just have played the year out to see what's what or they should have replaced him, whixh is a tall order for a team with so much else needing done. I just thought the reworked deal was dumb. Get cap but create another issue later. Just eat it and move on. I do think they were trying to create space for someone else but that's also a huge negative for me because the 'one player away mentality' has always been a failure that I can remember. Corbett was a known health issue, a waste of roster space really. BC has had a fractured ankle and a torn bicep so he isn't a huge shocker either, unlucky or injury prone at this point? Add in Moton and that unit was always suspect. Having both high priced OGs dealing with injuries 1 year removed from their big deals just seems like the chefs kiss to that entire build. So 2 known injury issues with starters, a backup that's probably injury prone now, Mays and then nobodies. I don't think I can call that decent depth, especially considering the 2 known starter issues coming into the year.
    • UnluckyforSome
      2025 College Football Thread

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Just imagine how great it will be when they eventually expand the playoff to 24 teams, or more. There will still only be 3 or 4 teams that have a real chance of winning the national championship, but the money-making opportunity will be too irresistible.
    • kungfoodude
      Trade Deadline Talk

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Trading Hubbard should be a decision made based on the "future" of the team. If they deem Rico a wiser investment, long term, Hubbard is expendable. If they deem Hubbard the wiser investment, long term, Rico is expendable. That doesn't mean they should have a price that is less than acceptable, however.
×
×
  • Create New...