Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team hosting DE Chris Smith (Update: SIGNED 1 year deal)


Untouchable

Recommended Posts

His length and versatility make sense.

EDIT:  I'll add this because I'm trying to get a sense of the players the staff likes, his athletic profile from the 2014 draft is below.  Better athlete than 76% of players in NFL.

Height 6010
Weight 266
Arms 34.125
Hands 9.5
Wing 83.125
40 yd 4.66
10 yd 1.66
Shuttle 4.46
3 Cone 7.37
BP 28
Vertical 37
Broad 10.08

_____________________________________

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

His length? He's 6'1". 8.5 career sacks over the course of six seasons. Looks like camp fodder with a chance to maybe get a roster spot.

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

His length? He's 6'1". 8.5 career sacks over the course of six seasons. Looks like camp fodder with a chance to maybe get a roster spot.

34-1/8" arms @ 6'1" is great length yes.  And yes, he shouldn't be viewed as anything but potentially a depth piece.

EDIT:  83-1/8" wingspan too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

Yep. At the end of the day, we gotta field a roster somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. At the end of the day, we gotta field a roster somehow.

Well if this was the plan we should still have alot of the AFL players numbers.. So we can atleast field a expansion team..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

I expect we will see a lot of these types of guys. Give them a chance but also easy to move on from. We need a ton of them this year if we aren't throwing stupid money around in free agency.

In fairness, Charles Johnson was 6-2, but anyone can find an exception to a rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...