Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

They ramped up production of masks.  

Good.

 

4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

I like that answer and I agree.

There needs to be other requirements that are guidelines like osha stuff where places that are frequented like grocery stores and pharmacies to protect the public and the workers. They need to be audited like regular but with these new guidelines in place.

also those that can do their jobs from home remain home. I’ve already read stories of companies requiring workers to come back to work when they can easily do their jobs from home. 
 

this is just a handful of things off the top of my head. This should be the new normal going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

Working from home will be fine until employers catch on to all the nonsense their employees are doing while they are supposed to be "working".  

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheRumGone said:

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

Bingo. The majority of the people working from home are likely salaried anyway. As long as the job is getting done, who cares?

It's not like there isn't a ton of time wasted in a typical office setting with small talk and interruptions from coworkers anyway.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
motocross_cat Community Regular

motocross_cat

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

Should add this does not apply to everyone.  However I'm seeing alot of people posting things on their social media showing them partying it up on tuesday with captions like " ha ha omg work life".  I mean how stupid can you be.  

Edited by motocross_cat
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

Should add this does not apply to everyone.  However I'm seeing alot of people posting things on their social media showing them partying it up on tuesday with captions like " ha ha omg work life".  I mean how stupid can you be.  

Yeah, it's stupid but again... as long as the job is getting done, who cares?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, Icege said:

What is the acceptable death rate to institute shelter-in-place practices?

Also, is it the death rate or total number of deaths that matters?

There's no black and white answers there. We constantly have infectious diseases circulating in our population that WILL result in deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no black and white answers there. We constantly have infectious diseases circulating in our population that WILL result in deaths.

Thought this was the TB thread and edited it since that seemed the more appropriate CV thread for the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Thought this was the TB thread and edited it since that seemed the more appropriate CV thread for the question

I thought it was a fair question. I mean, we are basically trying to strike a balance between managing loss of life and managing economic devastation. I'm not sure there is a clear cut right or wrong answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I thought it was a fair question. I mean, we are basically trying to strike a balance between managing loss of life and managing economic devastation. I'm not sure there is a clear cut right or wrong answer.

Works for me. Putting it back then

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. The majority of the people working from home are likely salaried anyway. As long as the job is getting done, who cares?

It's not like there isn't a ton of time wasted in a typical office setting with small talk and interruptions from coworkers anyway.

I remember when I had my first review as a salaried employee.  Back then I had a nice little side gig after work, so I had to run errands and stuff during my lunch hour, which meant my lunch hour sometimes ended up being 90 minutes or more.  My Senior Manager brought this up to the Vice President (who does the review) and the VP said "well is he getting his job done?"  The Senior Manager said yes.  The VP said "so why does it matter?"  Then moved on to the next thing on the list. LOL

My mom's job got "sent home" by a supervisor that didn't like her.  She thought it would end badly for my mom, but my mom loved working from home so it backfired.  But my mom was still hourly, and the supervisor was "worried" that she wasn't actually working the entire day.  As you said, she wouldn't have been working for every dollar if she were at the office, so as long as she does her job...who cares?  The supervisor changed her pay structure, and instead of paying her hourly she found a way to pay her for what she produced.  This also backfired, because my mom was able to get an entire day's worth of production done in half of a day, so she picked up side work and made more money than she ever did working in the office.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...