Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Locking down is not a political issue, it is a public health issue.

Still waiting for just one quote from an epidemiologist/virologist saying to move back slowly, like you originally claimed before you cowardly edited to a bunch of pointless nonsense.

https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/a-plan-for-a-phased-reopening-guided-by-public-health-principles.html

https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/national-coronavirus-response-a-road-map-to-reopening/

https://www.heritage.org/press/national-coronavirus-recovery-commission-announces-five-phase-plan-reopening-america

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

lol so the AEI and Heritage foundation are both right wing "think tanks" that are referencing the Johns Hopkins paper, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. For anyone that actually wants to be educated here's the actual link.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200417-reopening-guidance-governors.pdf

The john's hopkins paper is not recommending loosening restrictions. It is outlining HYPOTHETICAL WAYS IT COULD HAPPEN. I just read this for you because I know you're never going to but here's the meat and potatoes. 

Quote

States should consider initiating the reopening process when (1) the number of new cases has declined for at least 14 days; (2) rapid diagnostic testing capacity is sufficient to test, at minimum, all people with COVID-19 symptoms, including mild cases, as well as close contacts and those in essential roles; (3) the healthcare system is able to safely care for all patients, including providing appropriate personal protective equipment for healthcare workers; and (4) there is sufficient public health capacity to conduct contact tracing for all new cases and their close contacts.

So no, that in no way is epidemiologists saying taking aggressive measures is over with. That's saying how things COULD move forward AFTER appropriate actions were taken. 

Which of course they never were, except in places like NYC. 

Edited by electro's horse
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

lol so the AEI and Heritage foundation are both right wing "think tanks" that are referencing the Johns Hopkins paper, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. For anyone that actually wants to be educated here's the actual link.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200417-reopening-guidance-governors.pdf

The john's hopkins paper is not recommending loosening restrictions. It is outlining HYPOTHETICAL WAYS IT COULD HAPPEN. I just read this for you because I know you're never going to but here's the meat and potatoes. 

So no, that in no way is epidemiologists saying taking aggressive measures is over with. That's saying how things COULD move forward AFTER appropriate actions were taken. 

Which of course they never were, except in places like NYC. 

Yes, appropriate actions were taken, because we already took appropriate actions. We are not NYC. 

 

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

no they are not. 

how many baseless claims are prepared to just throw out in this?

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLPA medical director Thom Mayer said the league and union are working on an N95-like device to use on face masks for when players return.

"These modified face masks, which may include some form of either surgical or N95-like material in it, for a player...getting the helmet off, putting the mask right on afterwards, maintaining social distancing when not on the field as much as possible, using single-use hydration whether it be water or Gatorade...just every little detail anybody who's got a risk, I'd advise them to be zealous, religious, and frankly maniacally committed to minimizing the chance of spreading the virus," Mayer said. The league will undoubtedly instill some form of protection for players upon returning, and that likely won't end with upgraded face masks to wear on the field and along the sidelines. Viewers should continue to prepare for a very unique season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Yes, appropriate actions were taken, because we already took appropriate actions. We are not NYC. 

 

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

Exactly.  I guess he's been drinking too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Yes, the CDC is , after the appropriate actions have been taken. Which is still opening up slowly. Do you read your own links? It seems like you just have a different opinion on if "appropriate actions" were taken. Not about opening up slowly. 

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

Edited by electro's horse
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

So have you changed your position from "nobody is recommending that" to "those states are doing it wrong?"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

That's a huge caveat that you're just blowing past since almost NONE of the appropriate actions have been taking to start opening up. Not in Wisconsin, Georgia, or Texas. This has just been republican governors and judges saying "yeah fug it who cares."

you seem to think "do x if y" means "do x....a little"

Not really, like I said... this is not a R vs D debate on what actions have been taken. It is matter of opinion if they have are not. 

3 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

So have you changed your position from "nobody is recommending that" to "those states are doing it wrong?"

Exactly, I said.. Slow opening is recommended... I never said what the perimeters were to slowly re-open.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Paintballr said:

Should be a crime personally speaking if they knowingly released fake info in a crisis like this 

Right? I’m sure Gov Kemp (who probably should be investigated for rigging the GA election) was just following the lead of his president by altering data and releasing it to the public. Republican leaders make the mistake often that They assume the people they are talking to believe every word they say and follow them blindly. GOP is a cult and a deadly one. Playing with peoples lives. 

Edited by 4Corners
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Right? I’m sure Gov Kemp (who probably should be investigated for rigging the GA election) was just following the lead of his president by altering data and releasing it to the public. Republican leaders make the mistake often that They assume the people they are talking to believe every word they say and follow them blindly. GOP is a cult and a deadly one. Playing with peoples lives. 

You'll very rarely find me defending Trump, but even Trump has stated his disagreement with how fast and reckless Georgia has been with their reopening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'll very rarely find me defending Trump, but even Trump has stated his disagreement with how fast and reckless Georgia has been with their reopening.

TBH, I agree Georgia has opened too fast also. Slow... is the way to go..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...