Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
Just now, stirs said:

Our country is generally not concerned with what is being said, only with who said it.  Cuts out all the critical thinking mumbo jumbo

I definitely understand the "argument from authority" angle people try to use.  But in this case I think he tried it, without reading what the article was about.  Its kind of like having football coaches talking about challenges they are having with COVID and their team, and someone says "only someone who specializes in viruses can tell you that!"  Wait...what?

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

people have this really big problem understanding how job responsibilities are broken down among the medical profession. Like at their accounting firm or oil change shop they can tell you exactly what every single members role is and how it differs etc. But generally people hear doctor and think all health. That is incredibly incorrect. 

The people you want to listen to here are...

infectious disease - smartest people in med school go into ID. 

virologists - they study viruses

epidemiologists - they study how things spread

pulm/internal med/intensivists - these are the ones taking care of people after they're tubed or convalescing 

For things like this, look at what they do, what their exposure would be, and why we should listen to what they say about country wide policy. What does an emed doctor do here? Looks at a CT and sends them upstairs. The fact she's going on Fox news and complaining about a drug we know to do nothing being politicized, well, that should tell you all you need to know. 

This could also be like those old right wing 1,000 SCIENTISTS DENY CLIMATE CHANGE. Then it turned out half were meteorologists and the other half just had a problem with one piece of data out of a corner of canada but never actually denied the broader science.

Or the last time earlier this year where the list was just posted online and anyone could sign it. Unless there really is a Dr. Weedlord BonerHitler who works in proctology. 

So those doctors that you named are trained in alcohol abuse? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

You have to walk the line between economics and health and safety.  Even within those 2 groups, there are many considerations on economics and many on health and safety that all have to be considered.  Ripple effects to quick and short sighted answers to large problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, stirs said:

We are sorry to inform you that your job has been outsourced to a team of Russian nurses.  They are cheaper.....in many senses of the word

All the scab nurses come from like Micronesia, at least in Asheville. 

In Asheville all the russians work in waste management and that one dry cleaning place near biltmore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Experienced

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

i think that's basically the playbook now, say something stupid and ridiculous and outlandish, almost forcing a response and correction, just to steer the conversation away from legitimate concerns and then stupid people will still be like "well I guess (when confronted with obvious lies and nonsense vs. hard facts and science) the truth is somewhere in the middle"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

i think that's basically the playbook now, say something stupid and ridiculous and outlandish, almost forcing a response and correction, just to steer the conversation away from legitimate concerns and then stupid people will still be like "well I guess (when confronted with obvious lies and nonsense vs. hard facts and science) the truth is somewhere in the middle"

I had a patient yesterday asking if he should take it because the president told him to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

i think that's basically the playbook now, say something stupid and ridiculous and outlandish, almost forcing a response and correction, just to steer the conversation away from legitimate concerns and then stupid people will still be like "well I guess (when confronted with obvious lies and nonsense vs. hard facts and science) the truth is somewhere in the middle"

There is definitely some truth to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ImfromClayton
      Ideas on how to find a pass rush

      By ImfromClayton · Posted

      I'm not sure how much I'm changing mid year, especially when we are seeing some success.    Most Pass Rushers are physically gifted. Scheme and personnel help, but you gotta have the Jimmys and Joes, especially at that position.    We will likely lose games when the other team can throw for 400 yards, and has multiple high level receivers, but I think at this point in the development of our franchise, we have to be ok with that. You can't address every single issue at once. Really looks like we have plugged some holes on offense, and definitely in run defense. In the next draft, if we hit on a CB, an ILB and a Pass rusher, we will be pretty dangerous.
    • SetfreexX
      The Cavalry is Coming

      By SetfreexX · Posted

      No, stay the course, add via FA / Draft.
    • Icege
      Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL

      By Icege · Posted

      His route running was not very good in this game, especially when compared to the previous week. There were at least three playactions ran where I couldn't tell if he was going to be pass blocking or running a route with how little effort he ran with. They also dinged him for the fumble on the play where XL lateraled to him. 29.8 fumble grade, 6.1 pass block grade, and 40.0 receiving grade really hurt his overall score. Personally, I'd have put him in the mid-to-high 70s on the day. I don't think his receiving grade should've been 40.0 but can see an argument for in the 50s. Maybe his pass blocking grade could've also been in the teens since he did win on the final rep handily.   Just re-watched the receiving TD for Rico and it was a hideous route. DaRon Bland left his zone to cover over top of TMac though which left the area wide open for Rico to get to. Very surprised that they gave Bland a 66.5 coverage grade as I recall him getting picked on a couple of times (and giving up the 4th down throw to Renfrow by giving an incredibly soft cushion).
×
×
  • Create New...