Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DE Stephen Weatherly /panthers


NcPsa10

Recommended Posts

Solid signing--young, averaged 3 sacks a year for past 2 seasons-in on about 44% of the snaps those years.  He turns 26 this week.  6'5" 265.  Had a sack in the playoffs.

Played special teams.  High Character guy.  From Vandy.

Ran a 4.61 at the combine.  (6-5, 265) Not shabby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So you have no idea who he is but still come here hating.  The board is like a fuggin romper room.

Everyone knows he was a rotational guy and not even a starter. U don't paid that kind of money for that IDC who the fug he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WoahW said:

I know who he is and signing him isn’t the bad part it’s how much we gave him that is 

fair enough, the price isnt great but people in here are acting like we've destroyed our season lol it's ridiculous 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So you have no idea who he is but still come here hating.  The board is like a fuggin romper room.

THANK YOU!!  Just try to create an intelligent thread and the same turds flock to it to say absolutely nothing significant.  It gets old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beo said:

fair enough, the price isnt great but people in here are acting like we've destroyed our season lol it's ridiculous 

Like I said depending on structure it could help make it bad. Hurney is known to find Walmart guys and pay Target prices this is a perfect example of that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beo said:

fair enough, the price isnt great but people in here are acting like we've destroyed our season lol it's ridiculous 

Nah it was over for me when we decided to go with a college team in the NFL. Let me tell u first, it ain't going to be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WoahW said:

Like I said depending on structure it could help make it bad. Hurney is known to find Walmart guys and pay Target prices this is a perfect example of that 

i mean if you go back to what MHS just said earlier in the thread, and if you ask most vikings fans/look up what they think of him, there's nothing but postivity. he has the traits to be a potential starter, and i think we're signing him to see if he can be that for us. interesting DE who has a good 40 and is rangy on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Everyone knows he was a rotational guy and not even a starter. U don't paid that kind of money for that IDC who the fug he is.

Neither was Brian Burns (starter).  Would you bitch about his salary at 6m?  44% of the snaps is significant playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Neither was Brian Burns.  Would you bitch about his salary at 6m?  44% of the snaps is significant playing time.

He looked great and got benched by dumbass Rivera. He was a number 1 pick for a reason and we wasted his playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...