Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greatest Panthers By Position


jfra78

Recommended Posts

Name who you think were the greatest and 2nd greatest players for the Panthers at each position.

QB - Cam Newton / Jake Delhomme

HB - Christian McCaffery / Steven Davis

FB - Brad Hoover / Mike Tolbert

TE - Greg Olsen / Wesley Walls

WR - Steve Smith / Muhsin Mohammad

C - Ryan Kalil / Jeff Mitchell

G - Trai Turner / Mike Wahle

T - Jordan Gross / Blake Brockermeyer

DE - Julius Peppers / Mike Rucker

DT - Kris Jenkins / Kawaan Short

MLB - Luke Kuechly / Jon Beason

OLB - Thomas Davis / Kevin Greene

CB - Chris Gamble / Eric Davis

S - Mike Minter / Chris Harris

What you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Give me Dan Morgan over Beason all day

That’s a tough one. Id still put Beason just above Morgan or equal though. Different game same position. We need to draft a MLB though this draft. We’ve never not had a MLB from the draft(that was best in class). I’m not convinced they are gonna put Shaq in the middle even though he’ll probably be calling the defense this season. I see him calling from the OLB position. 
 

((that said I do think Shaq is going to ball out this season))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

That’s a tough one. Id still put Beason just above Morgan or equal though. Different game same position. We need to draft a MLB though this draft. We’ve never not had a MLB from the draft. I’m not convinced they are gonna put Shaq in the middle even though he’ll probably be calling the defense this season. 

I hadnt been on the Simmons train, but what you just said makes a lot of sense.  We have always had a dominant MLB and it seems to be part of our identity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've had an absolutely embarrassing amount of talent at MLB for such a young franchise. Sam Mills, Luke Kuechly, Jon Beason, Dan Morgan. That's one borderline HOFer (Sam Mills has been an HOF finalist), one highly probably HOFer (Luke), and two guys who had HOF talent but had their careers derailed by injuries (unfortunately a common theme among our MLB talent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Rucker, but I’d put CJ above Rucker. 
 

are we doing this based on skills or stats with the team? I love Davis but Dwill and JStew both I think could all swap with Davis (although Dwill has burned his bridges here) 

as said earlier, we’ve had stupid level of talent at the LB position. Dan could and should have been a HoF if it wasn’t for injuries, same for Beason. 
 

Jake is basically my QB growing up, but Steve was a pretty good QB too for a short time for us. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paintballr said:

I love Rucker, but I’d put CJ above Rucker. 
 

are we doing this based on skills or stats with the team? I love Davis but Dwill and JStew both I think could all swap with Davis (although Dwill has burned his bridges here) 

as said earlier, we’ve had stupid level of talent at the LB position. Dan could and should have been a HoF if it wasn’t for injuries, same for Beason. 
 

Jake is basically my QB growing up, but Steve was a pretty good QB too for a short time for us. 

 

It's basically just my personal opinion. I hard a hard time choosing between CJ and Ruck.  I went with Ruck because he had more tfl and more tackles in about the same amount of games played, which leads me to believe he was better vs the run.  CJ had more sacks, they were both fun to watch.  While Jake was QB, I always felt like Steve was a better QB and I felt like they did him wrong.  Jake went to a SB so kinda hard for me to put Steve ahead of him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
    • Not even what that's about. Moreover, remember that search engines are a tool.
    • Knowing how a person is compared to everyone else is always better. 
×
×
  • Create New...