Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will win more games?


stirs

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, stirs said:

Mistakes on offense kept them from probably 5 additional wins last season.

 

Yes but Jameis’ “on” moments were also huge for them offensively too. He has 5000 yards and 30 TDs, Brady isn’t going to walk in and do that at this stage in his career. And while Jameis isn’t that mobile, he’s more mobile than Brady is and Jameis was under insane pressure last year. I’d be surprised if Brady lasts the whole season to be honest. 

 

Yes Brady won’t have anywhere near the mistakes Winston had, but he’ll also have much less firepower than Jameis. Which factors in more is yet to be seen, but I doubt the Bucs are much better than they were last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats- I learned the hard way, do NOT bet against Bill. fyi he went 10-6 when brady injured his knee. Hes the goat coach and has plenty of video proof on teams.

Skins- Simply the panthers have the least talent in the NFL and Rhule with not get OTAs/rookie camp/or any function to build this team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots went 11-5 with Matt Cassel in 2008.

Last year their defense was 1st in points and yards, 2nd in turnovers, 1st in 1st down surrendered, top-5 in most metrics for passing and rushing and top-10 in the few they weren’t top-5 in with the exception of YPC given up (14th) but were still middle of the pack.

Belichick could probably win 10 games with anybody in this thread at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...