Marty Hurney Conference Call

[Mr. Scot]

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Not for running backs 

Is McCaffrey just a runningback?

Rodrigue is right. Somebody's gonna pay him. And yeah, it may be us.

[Cookie Lyon]

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Our organization never inferred that Cam “demanded” a trade. This is some CNN/FOX level twisting of a narrative. Stop being part of the problem.

Stop quoting me.

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Is McCaffrey just a runningback?

Rodrigue is right. Somebody's gonna pay him. And yeah, it may be us.

Yes he is a running back.  Like david Johnson like Todd Gurley.  You give him  a big contract you regret it immediately 

[Toomers]

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Not for running backs 

Why not. CMC is only making 2.8M this year. And a5th year option only guaranteed if he gets hurt. So you play on the last bit of leverage you have.as a team and try to get a smaller deal which gives him security before he takes another snap. Just like Zeke did last year with Cowboys  
 

  

[WarHeel]

4 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Stop quoting me.

I’ll call the BS when I see it. No one is exempt.

[Mr. Scot]

7 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

This proves that Cam didn't demand a trade like the Panthers tried to make it seem. 

Technically, they never said he did.

They stated that he was "being allowed" to seek a trade. That's not the same as saying he demanded one.

Now, can it be taken as sounding like he wants one? Yes, it can. That's how Newton himself took it, hence his reaction.

As some of us pointed out at the time, the Panthers have, for several months, used very flexible language when it came to Newton. What they said made it possible for people to basically hear what they wanted to hear, but equally possible for the team to state "we never actually said that" later if they wanted to.

It's pretty much the same as what politicians do when they're running for office.

I suspect people won't take their comments at face value so easily in the future (even if they're meant to be).

[Toomers]

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yes he is a running back.  Like david Johnson like Todd Gurley.  You give him  a big contract you regret it immediately 

  Something you have to open up negotiations to even find out what the player wants. His trade value is never higher either. Why wait or not approach him at all? 

[Basbear]

55 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why in the holy eff would we reach out to Cmac about a contract extension? 

Cause Zeke did it, now everyone thinks CMC should do the same. 

[Mr Mojo Risin]

31 minutes ago, Basbear said:

@thefuzz had a great comment about this. He said it feels like Herniay runs the show one day, then Rhule the next day , followed by Tepper daily show.

It is a literal circus poo show on fire

[Cookie Lyon]

3 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I’ll call the BS when I see it. No one is exempt.

LMAO! Who do you think you are? You're the one with the BS. 

[Cookie Lyon]

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Technically, they never said he did.

They stated that he was "being allowed" to seek a trade. That's not the same as saying he demanded one.

Now, can it be taken as sounding like he wants one? Yes, it can. That's how Newton himself took it, hence his reaction.

As some of us pointed out at the time, the Panthers have, for several months, used very flexible language when it came to Newton. What they said made it possible for people to basically hear what they wanted to hear, but equally possible for the team to state "we never actually said that" later if they wanted to.

It's pretty much the same as what politicians do when they're running for office.

I suspect people won't take their comments at face value so easily in the future (even if they're meant to be).

Valid point.

I took it the same way as Cam did as well.

[Basbear]

5 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

It is a literal circus poo show on fire

Its insane that even with the 19 stuff added, that did not add poo to the poo show cause it was already passed the limits.

[WarHeel]

1 minute ago, Cookie Lyon said:

LMAO! Who do you think you are? You're the one with the BS. 

Everything you type on here is littered with inferences, controversy, and prejudice. I’m just the guy who’s stating what is clear to the majority on here that maybe haven’t told you yet. 

[Mr. Scot]

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Yes he is a running back.  Like david Johnson like Todd Gurley.  You give him  a big contract you regret it immediately 

Maybe, but that's kinda like saying Barry Sanders was "just a runningback" when the reality was everything the Lions did was predicated on the threat of Sanders.

And honestly, it's generally a mistake to classify players purely by their position. Matt Ryan and Lamar Jackson are technically both quarterbacks, but there's a huge difference in what they can do.