Daniel Jones — Hypothetical

[t96]

https://www.rotoworld.com/football/nfl/player/49430/justin-herbert

 

Reports of Giants being extremely interested in Herbert who is the “top QB on their board” along with a new coaching staff. Yes DG drafted Jones last year and it’s 99.99% likely that they stick with him, but let’s say hypothetically they want to move on from Jones and take Herbert...

 

Would you be interested in Daniel Jones? What would you be willing to give up? 7 overall? He did show a ton of promise last year with no weapons outside of Barkley and a sh*t OL... Yeah it’s not gonna happen but still an interesting discussion.

 

I personally wouldn’t trade more value for him than the equivalent of a mid to late first round pick. 7 overall would be too much for me.

[mrcompletely11]

Are you high?

[jfra78]

No 

[jfra78]

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Are you high?

It is 4/20

[LinvilleGorge]

You don't draft a QB at #5 overall if the guy you just drafted last year at #6 overall actually "showed a ton of promise".

In reality, I think this is probably just a comically bad attempt to drum up a trade market for #5 to move down a few spots and still land one of the top OT prospects.

[Daddy_Uncle]

My God some of the stupid crap you people come up with

[t96]

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't draft a QB at #5 overall if the guy you just drafted last year at #6 overall actually "showed a ton of promise".

In reality, I think this is probably just a comically bad attempt to drum up a trade market for #5 to move down a few spots and still land one of the top OT prospects.

That’s very likely the case but there is a brand new HC there.

[JawnyBlaze]

Hayell no. A third at best. They probably wouldn’t take that, but I wouldn’t offer more. 

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Hayell no. A third at best. They probably wouldn’t take that, but I wouldn’t offer more. 

If it wasn't for just signing Bridgewater to a stupid deal, I'd happily send them #38. Jones is a helluva lot better (and cheaper) than Bridgewater. He threw for 24 TDs as a rookie in 12 starts than Teddy has ever thrown in a season (that number is 14 by the way).

[JawnyBlaze]

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If it wasn't for just signing Bridgewater to a stupid deal, I'd happily send them #38. Jones is a helluva lot better (and cheaper) than Bridgewater. He threw for 24 TDs as a rookie in 12 starts than Teddy has ever thrown in a season (that number is 14 by the way).

I guess you’re not wrong, I just don’t see him as a guy to build around. I put him on a similar level as Teddy, based on what little I’ve seen.  Maybe I’m wrong though, I didn’t watch a lot of Giants games

[Mr. Scot]

12 minutes ago, t96 said:

That’s very likely the case but there is a brand new HC there.

Okay, sure. But come on! The new head coach has already publicly stated that he's looking forward to working with Daniel Jo...wait 

[RASTAN66]

Q:  Can D. Jones beat out Teddy for the starting job?

A:  No.

 

Note:  I am a big fan of D. Jones.

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, RASTAN66 said:

Q:  Can D. Jones beat out Teddy for the starting job?

A:  No.

 

Note:  I am a big fan of D. Jones.

Jones was better as a rookie than Bridgewater has ever been.

[tijo]

Teddy is not our QB in 3 years. He's fine for now because, believe it or not, we're not going to win the SB this year... shocking, I know. 

But I would rather have every pick (even trading down to get more) to build our O-line and entire defense, so that when we do get our QB of the future, we actually can protect him and not have to play from behind every game.  Lawrence or Fields, come and play on your feet, not on your back.  Teddy can be our Alex Smith, and Justin Fields can be our Mahomes.