Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it down to New England or backup for Cam Newton?


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

What a wild offseason it has been. With the results of round one in the NFL draft, is it realistically down to New England as the only landing spot to be a starting QB for Cam Newton? Not in my wildest dreams would I think Cam would have to be a backup in 2020...what are your thoughts?

 

B10FFDD8-1056-4910-BBCB-CB4DD43F29C8.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jacksonville? Maybe Fournette will keep pounding the table. After that lots of backup slots maybe a Tampa or Indy knowing they’ll need a starter in a year or two? Give him time to get healthy. Winston still out there too.

Honestly depends on how much $$$ he wants. There’s places like Jacksonville and Chicago where if given the chance he could beat out the meh competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wes21 said:

Washington

 

And the Raiders make sense if they are truly ready to move on from Carr but want to generate some hype for the Vegas move.

Washington is a no go or they would have already made a play. Ron is not going to give up on the guy they just picked first a year ago and the owner disentangle seem to thrilled with that either. Raiders I could see, but they signed Marcus M, and seem content rolling with the two vets in place  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wes21 said:

Washington

 

And the Raiders make sense if they are truly ready to move on from Carr but want to generate some hype for the Vegas move.

Forgot about Washington. Haskins, but he could legitimately flop. Raiders as well although Carr was pretty good last year.

How about Atlanta for a couple years as a backup? Ryan’s contract has a bit of an out after 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarPanthers89 said:

Washington is a no go or they would have already made a play. Ron is not going to give up on the guy they just picked first a year ago and the owner disentangle seem to thrilled with that either. Raiders I could see, but they signed Marcus M, and seem content rolling with the two vets in place  

I don't think trading a 5th rounder for Kyle Allen would negate them potentially signing Cam, especially if they've made the decision to part ways with Haskins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zithers2 said:

I'm assuming the NFL isn't happening this season

Jaguars
Raiders
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots

Since all of these teams have QBs with expiring contracts or an iffy situation right now.

I’m talking starting this upcoming season, which will happen even if it’s at empty stadiums. Jags are rolling with Minshew who is just coming off his rookie season, colts won’t cut Rivers after just signing him, Cowboys no way Dak goes anywhere this offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
    • His wife makes great meatballs though. To be fair, he didn't hire himself here. He dazzled and bamboozled them with what they wanted to hear. He was going to be an innovative, program-builder, culture-installing football genius. They ate it up like those fabulous meatballs.
×
×
  • Create New...