Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So we have 3 new starters, yes?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Can anyone think of any reason whatsoever that Brown, Gross-Matos, and Chinn should not all start immediately and remain in the game for as many reps possible?

 

This is a year for growth and learning, not winning. Get these guys all the experience they can possibly handle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think chinn will actually end up starting at safety in the box with tre deep and Burris moving to the nickel role by the end of the year 

 

Ygm may not start off the bat but should by seasons end too

 

Just don't play our top picks at fuging gunner and I'm happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep we need secondary starters. Boston at FS with Chinn and Burris moving from SS and nickel play by play. Chinn can also play some weakside LB in a 4-3. If we can walk away with a decent CB like Hall this next round he might start too. YGM, KK, Brown, Burns on the line with Whitehead and Shaq playing LBs, Boston, Burris, Chinn are the safeties/nickel, and you have Jackson at CB on one side. Hall on the other would make a talented young defense. While the offense should be fun to watch, the defense should be entertaining by the middle of the season once these young guys start really grasping it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finding 3 starters is a good draft--and we did not even dip into the draft's strengths--OT, CB, WR.  There is something different about this draft---something seems to be pleasantly unusual.  Hmmmm. what could it be?

New point:  Did we not hear that Marty was trying to move back up into the first round?  Is there a theory about who they may have been targeting?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...